GFF vs. VST
GFF (Griffon Corporation) and VST (Vistra Corp.) are both stocks. GFF operates in Tools & Accessories (Industrials), while VST operates in Utilities - Independent Power Producers (Utilities). Over the past 5 years, GFF returned 35.01%/yr vs 54.40%/yr for VST. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GFF vs. VST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GFF achieves a 27.90% return, which is significantly higher than VST's -8.13% return.
GFF
- 1D
- -1.66%
- 1M
- 14.79%
- YTD
- 27.90%
- 6M
- 22.27%
- 1Y
- 39.89%
- 3Y*
- 37.45%
- 5Y*
- 35.01%
- 10Y*
- 22.94%
VST
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- 5.97%
- YTD
- -8.13%
- 6M
- -12.74%
- 1Y
- -14.37%
- 3Y*
- 83.39%
- 5Y*
- 54.40%
- 10Y*
- —
GFF vs. VST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFF Griffon Corporation | 27.90% | 4.42% | 17.97% | 83.96% | 36.91% | 41.60% | 1.83% | 97.74% | -44.92% | -21.43% |
VST Vistra Corp. | -8.13% | 17.66% | 261.52% | 70.73% | 5.08% | 19.57% | -11.87% | 2.46% | 24.95% | 18.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between GFF and VST is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2016 | 0.29 |
The correlation between GFF and VST shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GFF:
$0.76
VST:
$8.60
GFF:
124.05
VST:
17.20
GFF:
1.61
VST:
0.39
GFF:
1.84
VST:
2.19
GFF:
$2.35B
VST:
$17.20B
GFF:
$1.00B
VST:
$1.12B
GFF:
$245.38M
VST:
$4.34B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GFF vs. VST — Risk / Return Rank
GFF
VST
GFF vs. VST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Griffon Corporation (GFF) and Vistra Corp. (VST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GFF | VST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.99 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | -0.38 | +1.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.34 | -0.70 | +4.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GFF vs. VST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFF drawdown since its inception was -96.84%, which is greater than VST's maximum drawdown of -53.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFF and VST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFF | VST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.84% | -53.32% | -43.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.85% | -38.01% | +10.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.85% | -48.80% | +20.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.02% | -48.80% | +9.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.66% | -31.89% | +30.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.47% | -13.72% | -41.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.61% | 20.73% | -10.12% |
Volatility
GFF vs. VST - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Griffon Corporation (GFF) is 12.72%, while Vistra Corp. (VST) has a volatility of 15.14%. This indicates that GFF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GFF | VST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.72% | 15.14% | -2.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.86% | 37.96% | -12.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.24% | 48.75% | -12.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.23% | 47.97% | -6.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.37% | 42.22% | +3.15% |
Dividends
GFF vs. VST - Dividend Comparison
GFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, more than VST's 0.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFF Griffon Corporation | 0.90% | 1.03% | 0.88% | 4.10% | 6.62% | 1.16% | 1.50% | 1.44% | 12.27% | 1.23% | 0.80% | 0.96% |
VST Vistra Corp. | 0.61% | 0.56% | 0.63% | 2.13% | 3.12% | 2.64% | 2.75% | 2.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.97% | 0.00% |
Financials
GFF vs. VST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Griffon Corporation and Vistra Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GFF vs. VST - Profitability Comparison
GFF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Griffon Corporation reported a gross profit of 191.99M and revenue of 421.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.5%.
VST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vistra Corp. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
GFF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Griffon Corporation reported an operating income of 87.35M and revenue of 421.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.
VST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vistra Corp. reported an operating income of 1.50B and revenue of 5.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.
GFF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Griffon Corporation reported a net income of 46.94M and revenue of 421.86M, resulting in a net margin of 11.1%.
VST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vistra Corp. reported a net income of 980.00M and revenue of 5.64B, resulting in a net margin of 17.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GFF and VST have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VST has higher volatility (15.14%) compared to GFF (12.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFF dropped -96.84% vs VST's -53.32%.
GFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GFF and VST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer