GEW vs. GXTG
GEW (Cambria Global Equal Weight ETF) and GXTG (Global X Thematic Growth ETF) are both Global Equities funds. GEW is actively managed, while GXTG is passively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GEW charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GXTG.
Performance
GEW vs. GXTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GEW achieves a 6.46% return, which is significantly lower than GXTG's 13.19% return.
GEW
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- YTD
- 6.46%
- 6M
- 6.01%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXTG
- 1D
- -4.79%
- 1M
- -7.53%
- YTD
- 13.19%
- 6M
- 9.90%
- 1Y
- 9.86%
- 3Y*
- 2.83%
- 5Y*
- -10.83%
- 10Y*
- —
GEW vs. GXTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GEW Cambria Global Equal Weight ETF | 6.46% | 3.68% |
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 13.19% | -11.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between GEW and GXTG is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GEW vs. GXTG — Risk / Return Rank
GEW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GXTG
GEW vs. GXTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Equal Weight ETF (GEW) and Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GEW | GXTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.09 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.40 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.93 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GEW vs. GXTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GEW drawdown since its inception was -8.15%, smaller than the maximum GXTG drawdown of -67.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEW and GXTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GEW | GXTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.15% | -67.81% | +59.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -24.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -31.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -61.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.71% | -55.26% | +53.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.32% | -43.15% | +41.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.60% | — |
Volatility
GEW vs. GXTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GEW | GXTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.77% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 22.56% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.69% | 28.39% | -13.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.69% | 28.18% | -13.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.69% | 29.87% | -15.18% |
GEW vs. GXTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GEW has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than GXTG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
GEW vs. GXTG - Dividend Comparison
GEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than GXTG's 1.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GEW Cambria Global Equal Weight ETF | 0.97% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 1.24% | 1.40% | 1.08% | 1.99% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 0.48% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GEW and GXTG have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GEW is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GEW is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GXTG.
GXTG has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.97% for GEW.
They also come from different issuers: Cambria and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for GEW and 0.50% for GXTG.
Find the right allocation for GEW and GXTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer