GERM vs. GAMR
GERM (Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF) and GAMR (Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GERM is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Prime Treatments, Testing and Advancements Index, while GAMR is a Gaming fund tracking the VettaFi Video Game Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GERM returned 0.00% vs 19.82% for GAMR. GERM charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for GAMR.
Performance
GERM vs. GAMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GERM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 0.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GAMR
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 13.55%
- YTD
- 3.68%
- 6M
- 1.71%
- 1Y
- 19.82%
- 3Y*
- 16.12%
- 5Y*
- -0.52%
- 10Y*
- 12.82%
GERM vs. GAMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GERM Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GAMR Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF | 3.68% | 39.20% | 9.02% |
GERM vs. GAMR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GERM
GAMR
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
GERM
GAMR
-
Financial Services
GERM
GAMR
Basic Materials
GERM
-
GAMR
-
Communication Services
GERM
-
GAMR
Consumer Cyclical
GERM
-
GAMR
Consumer Defensive
GERM
-
GAMR
-
Energy
GERM
-
GAMR
-
Industrials
GERM
-
GAMR
-
Real Estate
GERM
-
GAMR
-
Technology
GERM
-
GAMR
Utilities
GERM
-
GAMR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GERM vs. GAMR — Risk / Return Rank
GERM
GAMR
GERM vs. GAMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM) and Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GERM | GAMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.58 | — |
Drawdowns
GERM vs. GAMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GERM drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum GAMR drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GERM and GAMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GERM | GAMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -55.37% | +55.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | 0.00% | -29.36% | +29.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -50.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -55.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -13.61% | +13.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -22.13% | +22.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 12.82% | -12.82% |
Volatility
GERM vs. GAMR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM) is 0.00%, while Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR) has a volatility of 5.88%. This indicates that GERM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GAMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GERM | GAMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 5.88% | -5.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.00% | 17.37% | -17.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 22.32% | -22.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 24.35% | -24.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 24.27% | -24.27% |
GERM vs. GAMR - Expense Ratio Comparison
GERM has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than GAMR's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
GERM vs. GAMR - Dividend Comparison
GERM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GAMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GAMR Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF | 0.50% | 0.52% | 0.63% |
GERM Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GAMR has higher volatility (5.88%) compared to GERM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GERM dropped 0.00% vs GAMR's -55.37%.
On 1-year performance, GAMR leads with 19.82% vs 0.00% for GERM. On fees, GAMR is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, GERM has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GAMR has performed better with a 19.82% return vs 0.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GAMR is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for GERM.
GAMR has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.00% for GERM.
GERM is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while GAMR is Gaming. GERM tracks Prime Treatments, Testing and Advancements Index, while GAMR tracks VettaFi Video Game Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for GERM and 0.59% for GAMR.
Find the right allocation for GERM and GAMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer