GERM vs. GDOC
GERM (Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF) and GDOC (Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. GERM is passively managed, while GDOC is actively managed. Over the past year, GERM returned 0.00% vs 9.15% for GDOC. GERM charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GDOC.
Performance
GERM vs. GDOC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GERM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 0.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDOC
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 2.52%
- YTD
- -4.32%
- 6M
- -5.32%
- 1Y
- 9.15%
- 3Y*
- 1.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GERM vs. GDOC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GERM Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GDOC Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF | -4.32% | 10.74% | -11.29% |
GERM vs. GDOC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GERM
GDOC
Healthcare
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
GERM
GDOC
Financial Services
GERM
GDOC
-
Basic Materials
GERM
-
GDOC
-
Communication Services
GERM
-
GDOC
-
Consumer Cyclical
GERM
-
GDOC
-
Consumer Defensive
GERM
-
GDOC
Energy
GERM
-
GDOC
-
Industrials
GERM
-
GDOC
-
Real Estate
GERM
-
GDOC
-
Technology
GERM
-
GDOC
-
Utilities
GERM
-
GDOC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GERM vs. GDOC — Risk / Return Rank
GERM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GDOC
GERM vs. GDOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM) and Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF (GDOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GERM | GDOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.11 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.59 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.28 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GERM vs. GDOC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GERM drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum GDOC drawdown of -31.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GERM and GDOC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GERM | GDOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -31.01% | +31.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | 0.00% | -15.67% | +15.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -12.38% | +12.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -15.86% | +15.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 7.16% | -7.16% |
Volatility
GERM vs. GDOC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM) is 0.00%, while Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF (GDOC) has a volatility of 5.05%. This indicates that GERM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDOC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GERM | GDOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 5.05% | -5.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.00% | 12.03% | -12.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 15.93% | -15.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 18.76% | -18.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 18.76% | -18.76% |
GERM vs. GDOC - Expense Ratio Comparison
GERM has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than GDOC's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
GERM vs. GDOC - Dividend Comparison
GERM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDOC Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF | 0.33% | 0.32% | 0.02% | 0.55% | 0.00% |
GERM Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDOC has higher volatility (5.05%) compared to GERM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GERM dropped 0.00% vs GDOC's -31.01%.
On 1-year performance, GDOC leads with 9.15% vs 0.00% for GERM. On fees, GERM is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, GERM has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GDOC has performed better with a 9.15% return vs 0.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GERM is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GDOC.
GDOC has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.00% for GERM.
They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for GERM and 0.75% for GDOC.
Find the right allocation for GERM and GDOC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer