GERM vs. BLOK
GERM (Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF) and BLOK (Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GERM is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Prime Treatments, Testing and Advancements Index, while BLOK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Amplify. GERM is passively managed, while BLOK is actively managed. Over the past year, GERM returned 0.00% vs 30.79% for BLOK. GERM charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for BLOK.
Performance
GERM vs. BLOK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GERM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 0.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLOK
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 7.72%
- YTD
- 16.21%
- 6M
- 7.24%
- 1Y
- 30.79%
- 3Y*
- 51.34%
- 5Y*
- 11.96%
- 10Y*
- —
GERM vs. BLOK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GERM Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BLOK Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF | 16.21% | 32.64% | 41.28% |
GERM vs. BLOK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GERM
BLOK
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
GERM
BLOK
-
Financial Services
GERM
BLOK
Basic Materials
GERM
-
BLOK
-
Communication Services
GERM
-
BLOK
Consumer Cyclical
GERM
-
BLOK
Consumer Defensive
GERM
-
BLOK
-
Energy
GERM
-
BLOK
-
Industrials
GERM
-
BLOK
Real Estate
GERM
-
BLOK
Technology
GERM
-
BLOK
Utilities
GERM
-
BLOK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GERM vs. BLOK — Risk / Return Rank
GERM
BLOK
GERM vs. BLOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM) and Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GERM | BLOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.48 | — |
Drawdowns
GERM vs. BLOK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GERM drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum BLOK drawdown of -73.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GERM and BLOK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GERM | BLOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -73.33% | +73.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | 0.00% | -35.64% | +35.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -73.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -10.16% | +10.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -26.08% | +26.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 16.23% | -16.23% |
Volatility
GERM vs. BLOK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM) is 0.00%, while Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK) has a volatility of 10.59%. This indicates that GERM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLOK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GERM | BLOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 10.59% | -10.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.00% | 28.55% | -28.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 38.29% | -38.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 42.36% | -42.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 38.97% | -38.97% |
GERM vs. BLOK - Expense Ratio Comparison
GERM has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than BLOK's 0.71% expense ratio.
Dividends
GERM vs. BLOK - Dividend Comparison
GERM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BLOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLOK Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF | 0.62% | 0.72% | 6.00% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 14.31% | 1.88% | 2.05% | 1.30% |
GERM Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLOK has higher volatility (10.59%) compared to GERM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GERM dropped 0.00% vs BLOK's -73.33%.
On 1-year performance, BLOK leads with 30.79% vs 0.00% for GERM. On fees, GERM is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, GERM has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BLOK has performed better with a 30.79% return vs 0.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GERM is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for BLOK.
BLOK has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for GERM.
GERM is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while BLOK is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for GERM and 0.71% for BLOK.
Find the right allocation for GERM and BLOK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer