PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GEQZX vs. GGBZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GEQZX vs. GGBZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds Equity Index Fund Investor Class (GEQZX) and GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GEQZX having a 11.19% return and GGBZX slightly lower at 10.82%. Over the past 10 years, GEQZX has outperformed GGBZX with an annualized return of 14.92%, while GGBZX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.52% annualized return.


GEQZX

1D
0.27%
1M
5.09%
YTD
11.19%
6M
11.48%
1Y
28.35%
3Y*
22.02%
5Y*
13.14%
10Y*
14.92%

GGBZX

1D
0.46%
1M
4.88%
YTD
10.82%
6M
11.85%
1Y
25.25%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
8.85%
10Y*
11.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GEQZX vs. GGBZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GEQZX
GuideStone Funds Equity Index Fund Investor Class
11.19%16.77%24.53%26.17%-19.99%27.94%17.85%31.34%-4.74%21.66%
GGBZX
GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund
10.82%19.62%15.45%20.67%-19.61%14.95%15.47%26.93%-10.15%25.53%

Correlation

The correlation between GEQZX and GGBZX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2002

0.95

The correlation between GEQZX and GGBZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GEQZX vs. GGBZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GEQZX
GEQZX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
GEQZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEQZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEQZX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
GEQZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEQZX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

GGBZX
GGBZX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
GGBZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGBZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGBZX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
GGBZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGBZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GEQZX vs. GGBZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Equity Index Fund Investor Class (GEQZX) and GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GEQZXGGBZXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.45

2.08

+0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.33

2.88

+0.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.38

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

2.57

+0.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.11

11.18

+3.93

GEQZX vs. GGBZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GEQZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the GGBZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GEQZX and GGBZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GEQZXGGBZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

2.08

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.58

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.70

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.41

+0.08

Drawdowns

GEQZX vs. GGBZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEQZX drawdown since its inception was -55.67%, roughly equal to the maximum GGBZX drawdown of -57.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEQZX and GGBZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GEQZXGGBZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.67%

-57.68%

+2.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.98%

-10.02%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-16.21%

-2.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.01%

-28.31%

+2.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.80%

-33.03%

-0.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.03%

-9.24%

+1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

2.30%

-0.39%

Volatility

GEQZX vs. GGBZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GuideStone Funds Equity Index Fund Investor Class (GEQZX) is 2.85%, while GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX) has a volatility of 3.61%. This indicates that GEQZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GGBZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GEQZXGGBZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

3.61%

-0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.98%

9.95%

-0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.86%

12.56%

-0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.91%

15.45%

+1.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.12%

16.46%

+1.66%

GEQZX vs. GGBZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GEQZX and GGBZX have an expense ratio of 0.39%.


Dividends

GEQZX vs. GGBZX - Dividend Comparison

GEQZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than GGBZX's 10.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GEQZX
GuideStone Funds Equity Index Fund Investor Class
1.22%1.35%3.58%3.71%1.12%3.05%2.13%2.02%1.79%1.94%1.42%1.67%
GGBZX
GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund
10.44%11.57%3.37%3.51%13.16%7.72%6.01%12.14%3.94%7.18%9.55%27.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, GEQZX and GGBZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GGBZX has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to GEQZX (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GEQZX dropped -55.67% vs GGBZX's -57.68%.

GEQZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GEQZX and GGBZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer