GEGTX vs. CBALX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GEGTX (Columbia Large Cap Growth Fund) and CBALX (Columbia Balanced Fund) are both mutual funds - GEGTX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Columbia, while CBALX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Columbia. Over the past 10 years, GEGTX returned 17.39%/yr vs 10.10%/yr for CBALX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GEGTX charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for CBALX.

Performance

GEGTX vs. CBALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Large Cap Growth Fund (GEGTX) and Columbia Balanced Fund (CBALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GEGTX achieves a 11.29% return, which is significantly higher than CBALX's 6.82% return. Over the past 10 years, GEGTX has outperformed CBALX with an annualized return of 17.39%, while CBALX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.10% annualized return.

GEGTX

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 8.62%
• YTD: 11.29%
• 6M: 10.25%
• 1Y: 30.15%
• 3Y*: 25.15%
• 5Y*: 14.66%
• 10Y*: 17.39%

CBALX

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 4.12%
• YTD: 6.82%
• 6M: 7.03%
• 1Y: 19.03%
• 3Y*: 15.37%
• 5Y*: 8.48%
• 10Y*: 10.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GEGTX vs. CBALX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GEGTX Columbia Large Cap Growth Fund	11.29%	16.44%	31.91%	43.94%	-32.01%	29.40%	34.43%	36.17%	-3.88%	28.00%
CBALX Columbia Balanced Fund	6.82%	14.14%	14.60%	21.49%	-16.63%	14.92%	17.91%	23.05%	-5.75%	14.29%

Correlation

The correlation between GEGTX and CBALX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 1996	0.93

The correlation between GEGTX and CBALX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GEGTX vs. CBALX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GEGTX

GEGTX Risk / Return Rank: 39
GEGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
GEGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
GEGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
GEGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
GEGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 32

CBALX

CBALX Risk / Return Rank: 64
CBALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
CBALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
CBALX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
CBALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
CBALX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GEGTX vs. CBALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Large Cap Growth Fund (GEGTX) and Columbia Balanced Fund (CBALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GEGTX	CBALX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	2.39	-0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	3.38	-0.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.44	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.05	2.96	-0.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.33	12.71	-5.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GEGTX vs. CBALX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GEGTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the CBALX Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GEGTX and CBALX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GEGTX	CBALX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.04	2.39	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	0.77	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82	0.89	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.71	-0.04

Drawdowns

GEGTX vs. CBALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEGTX drawdown since its inception was -53.08%, which is greater than CBALX's maximum drawdown of -34.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEGTX and CBALX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GEGTX	CBALX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.08%	-34.53%	-18.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.25%	-6.63%	-8.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.67%	-12.06%	-11.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.64%	-20.91%	-14.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.64%	-22.73%	-12.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.38%	0.00%	-0.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.92%	-5.31%	-4.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.25%	1.54%	+2.71%

Volatility

GEGTX vs. CBALX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Large Cap Growth Fund (GEGTX) has a higher volatility of 3.53% compared to Columbia Balanced Fund (CBALX) at 2.39%. This indicates that GEGTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GEGTX	CBALX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.53%	2.39%	+1.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.66%	6.35%	+5.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.34%	8.21%	+7.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.63%	11.08%	+10.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.28%	11.34%	+9.94%

GEGTX vs. CBALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GEGTX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than CBALX's 0.67% expense ratio.

Dividends

GEGTX vs. CBALX - Dividend Comparison

GEGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.92%, more than CBALX's 6.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CBALX Columbia Balanced Fund	6.08%	6.42%	7.83%	1.84%	5.36%	9.26%	5.31%	4.16%	5.82%	2.79%	1.60%	4.05%
GEGTX Columbia Large Cap Growth Fund	7.92%	8.81%	5.29%	4.12%	0.00%	8.54%	12.38%	8.02%	9.24%	6.28%	1.81%	10.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GEGTX and CBALX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, GEGTX and CBALX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GEGTX or CBALX?

GEGTX has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to CBALX (2.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GEGTX dropped -53.08% vs CBALX's -34.53%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CBALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.