PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GEGTX vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GEGTX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Large Cap Growth Fund (GEGTX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GEGTX achieves a 11.72% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 7.74% return. Over the past 10 years, GEGTX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 17.44%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.92% annualized return.


GEGTX

1D
1.13%
1M
8.83%
YTD
11.72%
6M
10.48%
1Y
31.62%
3Y*
25.31%
5Y*
14.55%
10Y*
17.44%

SCHG

1D
-0.57%
1M
5.91%
YTD
7.74%
6M
7.31%
1Y
27.05%
3Y*
25.53%
5Y*
16.21%
10Y*
18.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GEGTX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GEGTX
Columbia Large Cap Growth Fund
11.72%16.44%31.91%43.94%-32.01%29.40%34.43%36.17%-3.88%28.00%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
7.74%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between GEGTX and SCHG is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2009

0.98

The correlation between GEGTX and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GEGTX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GEGTX
GEGTX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
GEGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
GEGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GEGTX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Large Cap Growth Fund (GEGTX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GEGTXSCHGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.12

1.76

+0.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.83

2.37

+0.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.31

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

1.70

+0.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.57

5.70

+1.87

GEGTX vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GEGTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GEGTX and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GEGTXSCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

1.76

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.73

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.88

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.85

-0.18

Drawdowns

GEGTX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEGTX drawdown since its inception was -53.08%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEGTX and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GEGTXSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.08%

-34.59%

-18.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.25%

-16.41%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.67%

-23.39%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.64%

-34.59%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.64%

-34.59%

-1.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.57%

+0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.92%

-5.20%

-4.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.25%

4.90%

-0.65%

Volatility

GEGTX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Large Cap Growth Fund (GEGTX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) have volatilities of 3.45% and 3.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GEGTXSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.45%

3.31%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.66%

11.56%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.37%

15.45%

-0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.63%

22.27%

-0.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.28%

21.55%

-0.27%

GEGTX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GEGTX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

GEGTX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

GEGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.89%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GEGTX
Columbia Large Cap Growth Fund
7.89%8.81%5.29%4.12%0.00%8.54%12.38%8.02%9.24%6.28%1.81%10.17%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.36%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, GEGTX and SCHG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GEGTX has higher volatility (3.45%) compared to SCHG (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GEGTX dropped -53.08% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

GEGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GEGTX and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer