GDXY vs. ABNY

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

GDXY (YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF) and ABNY (YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDXY is a Gold fund actively managed by YieldMax, while ABNY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GDXY returned 20.95% vs 1.04% for ABNY. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GDXY charges 1.08%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for ABNY.

Performance

GDXY vs. ABNY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) and YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF (ABNY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXY achieves a -12.32% return, which is significantly lower than ABNY's 1.09% return.

GDXY

• 1D: 2.43%
• 1M: -8.59%
• YTD: -12.32%
• 6M: -11.68%
• 1Y: 20.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ABNY

• 1D: 1.11%
• 1M: 0.92%
• YTD: 1.09%
• 6M: 6.68%
• 1Y: 1.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDXY vs. ABNY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GDXY YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF	-12.32%	88.08%	-6.73%
ABNY YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF	1.09%	-2.05%	-9.52%

Correlation

The correlation between GDXY and ABNY is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2024	0.09

Return for Risk

GDXY vs. ABNY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDXY

GDXY Risk / Return Rank: 20
GDXY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
GDXY Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
GDXY Omega Ratio Rank: 22
GDXY Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
GDXY Martin Ratio Rank: 19

ABNY

ABNY Risk / Return Rank: 9
ABNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
ABNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
ABNY Omega Ratio Rank: 9
ABNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
ABNY Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDXY vs. ABNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) and YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF (ABNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GDXY	ABNY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.58	-0.05	+0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.92	0.09	+0.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.01	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.65	-0.07	+0.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.83	-0.15	+1.98

GDXY vs. ABNY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDXY Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is higher than the ABNY Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDXY and ABNY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GDXY vs. ABNY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXY drawdown since its inception was -34.16%, which is greater than ABNY's maximum drawdown of -31.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXY and ABNY.

Drawdown Indicators

	GDXY	ABNY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.16%	-31.62%	-2.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.16%	-17.87%	-16.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.61%	-15.00%	-14.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.72%	-16.24%	+9.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.05%	9.01%	+3.04%

Volatility

GDXY vs. ABNY - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) has a higher volatility of 14.51% compared to YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF (ABNY) at 5.94%. This indicates that GDXY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GDXY	ABNY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.51%	5.94%	+8.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.60%	19.17%	+13.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.00%	24.75%	+13.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.36%	30.00%	+2.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.36%	30.00%	+2.36%

GDXY vs. ABNY - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDXY has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than ABNY's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

GDXY vs. ABNY - Dividend Comparison

GDXY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 82.04%, more than ABNY's 51.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ABNY YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF	51.58%	53.45%	22.09%
GDXY YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF	82.04%	52.13%	23.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GDXY and ABNY in my portfolio?

GDXY and ABNY have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GDXY or ABNY?

GDXY has higher volatility (14.51%) compared to ABNY (5.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXY dropped -34.16% vs ABNY's -31.62%.

Which ETF is better, GDXY or ABNY?

On 1-year performance, GDXY leads with 20.95% vs 1.04% for ABNY. On fees, ABNY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, ABNY has been the lower-risk option at 5.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GDXY or ABNY?

Over the 1-year period, GDXY has performed better with a 20.95% return vs 1.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GDXY or ABNY?

ABNY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for GDXY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GDXY or ABNY?

GDXY has the higher dividend yield at 82.04%, compared with 51.58% for ABNY.

What is the main difference between GDXY and ABNY?

GDXY is categorized as Gold, while ABNY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for GDXY and 0.99% for ABNY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GDXY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.58 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.