GDXW vs. MAGX
GDXW (Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF) and MAGX (Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDXW is a Gold fund actively managed by Roundhill, while MAGX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GDXW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for MAGX.
Performance
GDXW vs. MAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDXW achieves a -4.89% return, which is significantly lower than MAGX's 1.49% return.
GDXW
- 1D
- -4.02%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- -4.89%
- 6M
- 2.36%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGX
- 1D
- -2.59%
- 1M
- 3.29%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 6M
- 0.41%
- 1Y
- 50.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDXW vs. MAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GDXW Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF | -4.89% | 21.25% |
MAGX Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.49% | -1.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDXW and MAGX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2025 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDXW vs. MAGX — Risk / Return Rank
GDXW
MAGX
GDXW vs. MAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW) and Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDXW | MAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.85 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
GDXW vs. MAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDXW drawdown since its inception was -36.83%, smaller than the maximum MAGX drawdown of -54.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXW and MAGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDXW | MAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.83% | -54.19% | +17.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -37.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.99% | -7.49% | -25.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.45% | -13.78% | +0.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 12.09% | — |
Volatility
GDXW vs. MAGX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDXW | MAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 28.81% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.39% | 39.88% | +21.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.39% | 53.52% | +7.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.39% | 53.52% | +7.87% |
GDXW vs. MAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDXW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDXW vs. MAGX - Dividend Comparison
GDXW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.39%, more than MAGX's 2.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GDXW Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF | 39.39% | 7.48% | 0.00% |
MAGX Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF | 2.02% | 2.05% | 0.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDXW and MAGX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MAGX is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MAGX is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GDXW.
GDXW has the higher dividend yield at 39.39%, compared with 2.02% for MAGX.
GDXW is categorized as Gold, while MAGX is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GDXW and 0.95% for MAGX.
Find the right allocation for GDXW and MAGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer