PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDXW vs. DRAM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDXW vs. DRAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GDXW

1D
-4.02%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
-4.89%
6M
2.36%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DRAM

1D
0.20%
1M
64.14%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDXW vs. DRAM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GDXW and DRAM is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2026

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDXW vs. DRAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GDXW vs. DRAM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GDXWDRAMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

341.95

-341.50

Drawdowns

GDXW vs. DRAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXW drawdown since its inception was -36.83%, which is greater than DRAM's maximum drawdown of -10.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXW and DRAM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDXWDRAMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.83%

-10.46%

-26.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.99%

0.00%

-32.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.45%

-1.64%

-11.81%

Volatility

GDXW vs. DRAM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDXWDRAMDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.39%

73.92%

-12.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.39%

73.92%

-12.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.39%

73.92%

-12.53%

GDXW vs. DRAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDXW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than DRAM's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

GDXW vs. DRAM - Dividend Comparison

GDXW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.39%, while DRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
DRAM
Roundhill Memory ETF
0.00%0.00%
GDXW
Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF
39.39%7.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


GDXW and DRAM have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DRAM is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DRAM is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GDXW.

GDXW has the higher dividend yield at 39.39%, compared with 0.00% for DRAM.

GDXW is categorized as Gold, while DRAM is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GDXW and 0.65% for DRAM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDXW and DRAM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer