PortfoliosLab logo
GDXJ vs. NEM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GDXJ and NEM is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.2

Performance

GDXJ vs. NEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-15.32%
52.57%
GDXJ
NEM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GDXJ:

1.54

NEM:

1.36

Sortino Ratio

GDXJ:

2.10

NEM:

1.87

Omega Ratio

GDXJ:

1.26

NEM:

1.27

Calmar Ratio

GDXJ:

0.84

NEM:

1.00

Martin Ratio

GDXJ:

6.39

NEM:

2.91

Ulcer Index

GDXJ:

9.22%

NEM:

17.91%

Daily Std Dev

GDXJ:

38.17%

NEM:

38.28%

Max Drawdown

GDXJ:

-88.66%

NEM:

-77.55%

Current Drawdown

GDXJ:

-52.79%

NEM:

-27.69%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXJ achieves a 45.64% return, which is significantly lower than NEM's 50.54% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GDXJ having a 11.17% annualized return and NEM not far behind at 10.69%.


GDXJ

YTD

45.64%

1M

10.74%

6M

18.75%

1Y

55.77%

5Y*

9.96%

10Y*

11.17%

NEM

YTD

50.54%

1M

17.14%

6M

14.45%

1Y

47.61%

5Y*

0.74%

10Y*

10.69%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GDXJ vs. NEM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDXJ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GDXJ is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GDXJ is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GDXJ is 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GDXJ is 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GDXJ is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GDXJ is 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

NEM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NEM is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NEM is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NEM is 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NEM is 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NEM is 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NEM is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GDXJ vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for GDXJ, currently valued at 1.54, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
GDXJ: 1.54
NEM: 1.36
The chart of Sortino ratio for GDXJ, currently valued at 2.10, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
GDXJ: 2.10
NEM: 1.87
The chart of Omega ratio for GDXJ, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
GDXJ: 1.26
NEM: 1.27
The chart of Calmar ratio for GDXJ, currently valued at 0.84, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
GDXJ: 0.84
NEM: 1.00
The chart of Martin ratio for GDXJ, currently valued at 6.39, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
GDXJ: 6.39
NEM: 2.91

The current GDXJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the NEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDXJ and NEM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
1.54
1.36
GDXJ
NEM

Dividends

GDXJ vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison

GDXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, which matches NEM's 1.80% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GDXJ
VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF
1.79%2.61%0.72%0.51%1.78%1.58%0.39%0.45%0.03%4.78%0.72%0.74%
NEM
Newmont Goldcorp Corporation
1.80%2.69%3.87%4.66%3.55%1.74%3.31%1.62%0.67%0.37%0.56%1.19%

Drawdowns

GDXJ vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXJ drawdown since its inception was -88.66%, which is greater than NEM's maximum drawdown of -77.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXJ and NEM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-52.79%
-27.69%
GDXJ
NEM

Volatility

GDXJ vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a higher volatility of 17.58% compared to Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM) at 16.50%. This indicates that GDXJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
17.58%
16.50%
GDXJ
NEM