NEM vs. GOLD

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM) and Gold.com, Inc (GOLD).

Performance

NEM vs. GOLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM) and Gold.com, Inc (GOLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NEM vs. GOLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NEM Newmont Goldcorp Corporation	8.63%	10.36%
GOLD Gold.com, Inc	18.11%	14.34%

Fundamentals

EPS NEM : $7.91 GOLD : $0.48
PE Ratio NEM : 13.69 GOLD : 84.27
PS Ratio NEM : 5.15 GOLD : 0.07
Total Revenue (TTM) NEM : $15.51B GOLD : $15.68B
Gross Profit (TTM) NEM : $7.14B GOLD : $288.97M
EBITDA (TTM) NEM : $13.38B GOLD : $6.19M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NEM achieves a 8.63% return, which is significantly lower than GOLD's 18.11% return.

NEM

• 1D: 4.97%
• 1M: -16.56%
• YTD: 8.63%
• 6M: 29.03%
• 1Y: 127.13%
• 3Y*: 33.46%
• 5Y*: 15.27%
• 10Y*: 17.90%

GOLD

• 1D: 5.53%
• 1M: -30.26%
• YTD: 18.11%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

NEM vs. GOLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEM

NEM Risk / Return Rank: 93
NEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
NEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
NEM Omega Ratio Rank: 92
NEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
NEM Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NEM vs. GOLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM) and Gold.com, Inc (GOLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NEM	GOLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.78	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.89	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.70	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.66	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NEM	GOLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.78	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.13	2.40	-2.27

Correlation

The correlation between NEM and GOLD is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

NEM vs. GOLD - Dividend Comparison

NEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, more than GOLD's 0.50% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NEM Newmont Goldcorp Corporation	0.93%	1.00%	2.69%	3.87%	4.66%	3.55%	1.74%	3.31%	1.62%	0.67%	0.37%	0.56%
GOLD Gold.com, Inc	0.50%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

NEM vs. GOLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NEM drawdown since its inception was -81.30%, which is greater than GOLD's maximum drawdown of -40.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEM and GOLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	NEM	GOLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.30%	-40.58%	-40.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-62.40%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-62.40%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.80%	-37.30%	+19.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.50%	-9.26%	-32.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.18%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NEM	GOLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.18%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.47%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.03%	64.88%	-18.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.87%	64.88%	-28.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.65%	64.88%	-29.23%

Financials