NEM vs. RGLD
Compare and contrast key facts about Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM) and Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD).
Performance
NEM vs. RGLD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NEM vs. RGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEM Newmont Goldcorp Corporation | 8.63% | 172.82% | -7.83% | -8.76% | -20.77% | 7.40% | 40.28% | 30.52% | -6.15% | 10.91% |
RGLD Royal Gold, Inc. | 14.73% | 70.43% | 10.39% | 8.70% | 8.51% | 0.04% | -12.13% | 44.27% | 5.53% | 31.32% |
Fundamentals
NEM:
$7.91
RGLD:
$8.08
NEM:
13.69
RGLD:
31.51
NEM:
0.36
RGLD:
2.14
NEM:
5.15
RGLD:
17.51
NEM:
$15.51B
RGLD:
$1.03B
NEM:
$7.14B
RGLD:
$504.63M
NEM:
$13.38B
RGLD:
$742.55M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NEM achieves a 8.63% return, which is significantly lower than RGLD's 14.73% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NEM having a 17.90% annualized return and RGLD not far ahead at 18.65%.
NEM
- 1D
- 4.97%
- 1M
- -16.56%
- YTD
- 8.63%
- 6M
- 29.03%
- 1Y
- 127.13%
- 3Y*
- 33.46%
- 5Y*
- 15.27%
- 10Y*
- 17.90%
RGLD
- 1D
- 6.59%
- 1M
- -15.11%
- YTD
- 14.73%
- 6M
- 27.44%
- 1Y
- 57.14%
- 3Y*
- 26.67%
- 5Y*
- 19.30%
- 10Y*
- 18.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NEM vs. RGLD — Risk / Return Rank
NEM
RGLD
NEM vs. RGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM) and Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NEM | RGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.78 | 1.45 | +1.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.89 | 1.88 | +1.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.26 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.70 | 2.00 | +2.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.66 | 6.42 | +9.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NEM | RGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.78 | 1.45 | +1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.63 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.55 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.18 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between NEM and RGLD is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
NEM vs. RGLD - Dividend Comparison
NEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, more than RGLD's 0.72% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEM Newmont Goldcorp Corporation | 0.93% | 1.00% | 2.69% | 3.87% | 4.66% | 3.55% | 1.74% | 3.31% | 1.62% | 0.67% | 0.37% | 0.56% |
RGLD Royal Gold, Inc. | 0.72% | 0.81% | 1.21% | 1.24% | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.05% | 0.87% | 1.17% | 1.17% | 1.45% | 1.81% |
Drawdowns
NEM vs. RGLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NEM drawdown since its inception was -81.30%, smaller than the maximum RGLD drawdown of -98.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NEM and RGLD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NEM | RGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.30% | -98.29% | +16.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.25% | -29.27% | +2.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.40% | -40.73% | -21.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.40% | -49.55% | -12.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.80% | -16.37% | -1.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.50% | -29.87% | -11.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.18% | 9.10% | -0.92% |
Volatility
NEM vs. RGLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM) is 15.18%, while Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) has a volatility of 16.92%. This indicates that NEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NEM | RGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.18% | 16.92% | -1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.47% | 32.30% | +5.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.03% | 39.50% | +6.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.87% | 31.04% | +5.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.65% | 33.83% | +1.82% |
Financials
NEM vs. RGLD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Newmont Goldcorp Corporation and Royal Gold, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities