GDXD vs. ICOP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GDXD (MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) and ICOP (iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDXD is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross (-300%), while ICOP is a Copper fund tracking the STOXX Global Copper and Metals Mining Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GDXD returned -84.34%/yr vs 30.39%/yr for ICOP. At a correlation of -0.66, they often move in opposite directions. GDXD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for ICOP.

Performance

GDXD vs. ICOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (GDXD) and iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXD achieves a -44.09% return, which is significantly lower than ICOP's 13.96% return.

GDXD

• 1D: 14.60%
• 1M: 10.85%
• YTD: -44.09%
• 6M: -36.28%
• 1Y: -92.07%
• 3Y*: -84.34%
• 5Y*: -73.69%
• 10Y*: —

ICOP

• 1D: -5.31%
• 1M: -3.15%
• YTD: 13.96%
• 6M: 12.44%
• 1Y: 82.41%
• 3Y*: 30.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDXD vs. ICOP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
GDXD MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs	-44.09%	-97.53%	-57.78%	-33.88%
ICOP iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF	13.96%	78.01%	1.10%	8.08%

Correlation

The correlation between GDXD and ICOP is -0.72, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2023	-0.66

The correlation between GDXD and ICOP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.72 to -0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

GDXD vs. ICOP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GDXD	ICOP
Basic Materials	100.0%	100.0%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

GDXD vs. ICOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDXD

GDXD Risk / Return Rank: 2
GDXD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
GDXD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
GDXD Omega Ratio Rank: 2
GDXD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
GDXD Martin Ratio Rank: 3

ICOP

ICOP Risk / Return Rank: 61
ICOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
ICOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
ICOP Omega Ratio Rank: 56
ICOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
ICOP Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDXD vs. ICOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (GDXD) and iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GDXD	ICOP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.64	2.09	-2.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.57	2.50	-4.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.83	1.33	-0.50
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.96	3.17	-4.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.17	11.16	-12.33

GDXD vs. ICOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDXD Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is lower than the ICOP Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDXD and ICOP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GDXD vs. ICOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXD drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than ICOP's maximum drawdown of -38.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXD and ICOP.

Drawdown Indicators

	GDXD	ICOP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.96%	-38.67%	-61.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-96.33%	-26.13%	-70.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-99.86%	-38.67%	-61.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.92%	-13.41%	-86.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-72.06%	-11.61%	-60.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	78.80%	7.41%	+71.39%

Volatility

GDXD vs. ICOP - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (GDXD) has a higher volatility of 53.31% compared to iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) at 16.27%. This indicates that GDXD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GDXD	ICOP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	53.31%	16.27%	+37.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	117.73%	35.00%	+82.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	143.27%	39.67%	+103.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	111.54%	34.44%	+77.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	110.62%	34.44%	+76.18%

GDXD vs. ICOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDXD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ICOP's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

GDXD vs. ICOP - Dividend Comparison

GDXD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ICOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GDXD MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ICOP iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF	1.78%	2.08%	1.87%	2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GDXD and ICOP in my portfolio?

GDXD and ICOP have a correlation of -0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GDXD or ICOP?

GDXD has higher volatility (53.31%) compared to ICOP (16.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXD dropped -99.96% vs ICOP's -38.67%.

Which ETF is better, GDXD or ICOP?

On 3-year performance, ICOP leads with 30.39% vs -84.34% for GDXD. On fees, ICOP is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, ICOP has been the lower-risk option at 16.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GDXD or ICOP?

Over the 3-year period, ICOP has performed better with a 30.39% return vs -84.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GDXD or ICOP?

ICOP is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for GDXD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GDXD or ICOP?

ICOP has the higher dividend yield at 1.78%, compared with 0.00% for GDXD.

What is the main difference between GDXD and ICOP?

GDXD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while ICOP is Copper. GDXD tracks S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross (-300%), while ICOP tracks STOXX Global Copper and Metals Mining Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for GDXD and 0.47% for ICOP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ICOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.