GDXD vs. HDGE
GDXD (MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) and HDGE (AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. GDXD is passively managed, while HDGE is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GDXD returned -72.73%/yr vs -2.89%/yr for HDGE. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GDXD charges 0.95%/yr vs 3.36%/yr for HDGE.
Performance
GDXD vs. HDGE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDXD achieves a -51.20% return, which is significantly lower than HDGE's 5.43% return.
GDXD
- 1D
- 10.76%
- 1M
- -10.12%
- YTD
- -51.20%
- 6M
- -62.62%
- 1Y
- -93.08%
- 3Y*
- -84.24%
- 5Y*
- -72.73%
- 10Y*
- —
HDGE
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- -2.09%
- YTD
- 5.43%
- 6M
- 5.59%
- 1Y
- -0.65%
- 3Y*
- -5.06%
- 5Y*
- -2.89%
- 10Y*
- -14.77%
GDXD vs. HDGE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXD MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | -51.20% | -97.53% | -57.78% | -52.35% | -52.56% | -19.71% | -13.30% |
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF | 5.43% | 1.50% | -8.01% | -26.98% | 16.59% | -18.61% | -7.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDXD and HDGE is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2020 | 0.26 |
The correlation between GDXD and HDGE shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GDXD vs. HDGE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GDXD
HDGE
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
GDXD
HDGE
Communication Services
GDXD
-
HDGE
Consumer Cyclical
GDXD
-
HDGE
Consumer Defensive
GDXD
-
HDGE
Energy
GDXD
-
HDGE
Financial Services
GDXD
-
HDGE
Healthcare
GDXD
-
HDGE
Industrials
GDXD
-
HDGE
Real Estate
GDXD
-
HDGE
Technology
GDXD
-
HDGE
Utilities
GDXD
-
HDGE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDXD vs. HDGE — Risk / Return Rank
GDXD
HDGE
GDXD vs. HDGE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (GDXD) and AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDXD | HDGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.01 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | -0.05 | -0.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.22 | -0.11 | -1.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDXD | HDGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.68 | -0.04 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.66 | -0.12 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.67 | -0.67 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
GDXD vs. HDGE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDXD drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than HDGE's maximum drawdown of -93.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXD and HDGE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDXD | HDGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.96% | -93.88% | -6.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -96.33% | -12.26% | -84.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.86% | -29.46% | -70.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.96% | -42.97% | -56.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -83.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.93% | -93.08% | -6.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.85% | -70.11% | -1.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 75.91% | 6.16% | +69.75% |
Volatility
GDXD vs. HDGE - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (GDXD) has a higher volatility of 47.44% compared to AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) at 6.41%. This indicates that GDXD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDGE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDXD | HDGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 47.44% | 6.41% | +41.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 109.86% | 12.81% | +97.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 136.25% | 18.33% | +117.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 109.97% | 24.18% | +85.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 109.35% | 23.56% | +85.79% |
GDXD vs. HDGE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDXD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than HDGE's 3.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDXD vs. HDGE - Dividend Comparison
GDXD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HDGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXD MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF | 3.32% | 3.50% | 7.83% | 9.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDXD and HDGE have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDXD has higher volatility (47.44%) compared to HDGE (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXD dropped -99.96% vs HDGE's -93.88%.
On 5-year performance, HDGE leads with -2.89% vs -72.73% for GDXD. On fees, GDXD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, HDGE has been the lower-risk option at 6.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HDGE has performed better with a -2.89% return vs -72.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GDXD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 3.36% for HDGE.
HDGE has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 0.00% for GDXD.
They also come from different issuers: BMO and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for GDXD and 3.36% for HDGE.
HDGE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.04 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDXD and HDGE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer