PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDXD vs. HDGE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDXD vs. HDGE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (GDXD) and AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXD achieves a -51.20% return, which is significantly lower than HDGE's 5.43% return.


GDXD

1D
10.76%
1M
-10.12%
YTD
-51.20%
6M
-62.62%
1Y
-93.08%
3Y*
-84.24%
5Y*
-72.73%
10Y*

HDGE

1D
2.55%
1M
-2.09%
YTD
5.43%
6M
5.59%
1Y
-0.65%
3Y*
-5.06%
5Y*
-2.89%
10Y*
-14.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDXD vs. HDGE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GDXD
MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs
-51.20%-97.53%-57.78%-52.35%-52.56%-19.71%-13.30%
HDGE
AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF
5.43%1.50%-8.01%-26.98%16.59%-18.61%-7.34%

Correlation

The correlation between GDXD and HDGE is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2020

0.26

The correlation between GDXD and HDGE shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GDXD vs. HDGE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GDXD
HDGE

Basic Materials

100.0%
-1.3%

Communication Services

-

-3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-18.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

-4.9%

Energy

-

-2.5%

Financial Services

-

-23.5%

Healthcare

-

-3.5%

Industrials

-

-14.1%

Real Estate

-

-9.0%

Technology

-

-26.1%

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

GDXD
100.0%
HDGE
-1.3%

Communication Services

GDXD

-

HDGE
-3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

GDXD

-

HDGE
-18.6%

Consumer Defensive

GDXD

-

HDGE
-4.9%

Energy

GDXD

-

HDGE
-2.5%

Financial Services

GDXD

-

HDGE
-23.5%

Healthcare

GDXD

-

HDGE
-3.5%

Industrials

GDXD

-

HDGE
-14.1%

Real Estate

GDXD

-

HDGE
-9.0%

Technology

GDXD

-

HDGE
-26.1%

Utilities

GDXD

-

HDGE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDXD vs. HDGE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDXD
GDXD Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
GDXD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXD Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXD Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXD Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXD Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

HDGE
HDGE Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
HDGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDGE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
HDGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDGE Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDXD vs. HDGE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (GDXD) and AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GDXDHDGEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

1.01

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.97

-0.05

-0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.22

-0.11

-1.12

GDXD vs. HDGE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDXD Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is lower than the HDGE Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDXD and HDGE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GDXDHDGEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.68

-0.04

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.66

-0.12

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.67

-0.67

+0.01

Drawdowns

GDXD vs. HDGE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXD drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than HDGE's maximum drawdown of -93.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXD and HDGE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDXDHDGEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.96%

-93.88%

-6.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-96.33%

-12.26%

-84.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.86%

-29.46%

-70.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.96%

-42.97%

-56.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.93%

-93.08%

-6.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-71.85%

-70.11%

-1.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

75.91%

6.16%

+69.75%

Volatility

GDXD vs. HDGE - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (GDXD) has a higher volatility of 47.44% compared to AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) at 6.41%. This indicates that GDXD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDGE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDXDHDGEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

47.44%

6.41%

+41.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

109.86%

12.81%

+97.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

136.25%

18.33%

+117.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

109.97%

24.18%

+85.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

109.35%

23.56%

+85.79%

GDXD vs. HDGE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDXD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than HDGE's 3.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

GDXD vs. HDGE - Dividend Comparison

GDXD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HDGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
GDXD
MicroSectors Gold Miners -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HDGE
AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF
3.32%3.50%7.83%9.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


GDXD and HDGE have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDXD has higher volatility (47.44%) compared to HDGE (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXD dropped -99.96% vs HDGE's -93.88%.

On 5-year performance, HDGE leads with -2.89% vs -72.73% for GDXD. On fees, GDXD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, HDGE has been the lower-risk option at 6.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HDGE has performed better with a -2.89% return vs -72.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GDXD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 3.36% for HDGE.

HDGE has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 0.00% for GDXD.

They also come from different issuers: BMO and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for GDXD and 3.36% for HDGE.

HDGE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.04 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDXD and HDGE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer