GDX vs. XME
GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) and XME (SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDX is a Gold fund tracking the NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index, while XME is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GDX returned 13.29%/yr vs 19.60%/yr for XME. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GDX charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XME.
Performance
GDX vs. XME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDX achieves a -6.69% return, which is significantly lower than XME's 16.32% return. Over the past 10 years, GDX has underperformed XME with an annualized return of 13.29%, while XME has yielded a comparatively higher 19.60% annualized return.
GDX
- 1D
- 2.97%
- 1M
- -16.83%
- YTD
- -6.69%
- 6M
- -5.89%
- 1Y
- 50.59%
- 3Y*
- 38.96%
- 5Y*
- 17.51%
- 10Y*
- 13.29%
XME
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- 16.32%
- 6M
- 18.13%
- 1Y
- 86.41%
- 3Y*
- 35.23%
- 5Y*
- 21.78%
- 10Y*
- 19.60%
GDX vs. XME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | -6.69% | 154.77% | 10.63% | 9.98% | -9.01% | -9.52% | 23.66% | 39.84% | -8.77% | 11.99% |
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | 16.32% | 83.47% | -4.54% | 21.51% | 13.13% | 34.92% | 15.95% | 14.69% | -26.78% | 21.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDX and XME is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006 | 0.54 |
The correlation between GDX and XME shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (10 years) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GDX vs. XME - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GDX
XME
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
GDX
XME
Communication Services
GDX
-
XME
-
Consumer Cyclical
GDX
-
XME
-
Consumer Defensive
GDX
-
XME
Energy
GDX
-
XME
Financial Services
GDX
-
XME
-
Healthcare
GDX
-
XME
-
Industrials
GDX
-
XME
Real Estate
GDX
-
XME
-
Technology
GDX
-
XME
Utilities
GDX
-
XME
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDX vs. XME — Risk / Return Rank
GDX
XME
GDX vs. XME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDX | XME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.37 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | 3.84 | -2.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.87 | 9.58 | -5.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDX vs. XME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDX drawdown since its inception was -80.34%, smaller than the maximum XME drawdown of -85.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDX and XME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDX | XME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.34% | -85.89% | +5.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.28% | -22.60% | -13.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.28% | -30.47% | -5.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.51% | -37.27% | -9.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.79% | -61.69% | +11.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.91% | -9.33% | -21.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.41% | -44.09% | +3.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.11% | 9.05% | +4.06% |
Volatility
GDX vs. XME - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a higher volatility of 17.20% compared to SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) at 15.26%. This indicates that GDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDX | XME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.20% | 15.26% | +1.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.15% | 28.51% | +10.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.89% | 36.11% | +10.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.74% | 32.84% | +3.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.34% | 32.96% | +4.38% |
GDX vs. XME - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than XME's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDX vs. XME - Dividend Comparison
GDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, more than XME's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | 0.79% | 0.74% | 1.19% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% |
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | 0.32% | 0.38% | 0.65% | 1.00% | 1.64% | 0.70% | 0.99% | 2.43% | 2.23% | 1.15% | 1.02% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDX and XME have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDX has higher volatility (17.20%) compared to XME (15.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDX dropped -80.34% vs XME's -85.89%.
On 10-year performance, XME leads with 19.60% vs 13.29% for GDX. On fees, XME is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XME has been the lower-risk option at 15.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XME has performed better with a 19.60% return vs 13.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XME is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for GDX.
GDX has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.32% for XME.
GDX is categorized as Gold, while XME is Materials. GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index, while XME tracks S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for GDX and 0.35% for XME.
XME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDX and XME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer