GDX vs. SQQQ
GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) and SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - GDX is a Gold fund tracking the NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index, while SQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GDX returned 12.82%/yr vs -55.68%/yr for SQQQ. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. GDX charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SQQQ.
Performance
GDX vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDX achieves a -8.28% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -39.28% return. Over the past 10 years, GDX has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of 12.82%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -55.68% annualized return.
GDX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -16.83%
- YTD
- -8.28%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- 53.51%
- 3Y*
- 37.89%
- 5Y*
- 17.28%
- 10Y*
- 12.82%
SQQQ
- 1D
- -4.47%
- 1M
- -3.08%
- YTD
- -39.28%
- 6M
- -36.43%
- 1Y
- -60.85%
- 3Y*
- -54.68%
- 5Y*
- -47.98%
- 10Y*
- -55.68%
GDX vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | -8.28% | 154.77% | 10.63% | 9.98% | -9.01% | -9.52% | 23.66% | 39.84% | -8.77% | 11.99% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | -39.28% | -53.05% | -49.79% | -73.61% | 82.40% | -60.87% | -86.40% | -65.92% | -20.83% | -58.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDX and SQQQ is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010 | -0.18 |
The correlation between GDX and SQQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.34 (1 year) to -0.18 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GDX vs. SQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GDX
SQQQ
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
GDX
SQQQ
-
Communication Services
GDX
-
SQQQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
GDX
-
SQQQ
-
Consumer Defensive
GDX
-
SQQQ
-
Energy
GDX
-
SQQQ
-
Financial Services
GDX
-
SQQQ
Healthcare
GDX
-
SQQQ
-
Industrials
GDX
-
SQQQ
-
Real Estate
GDX
-
SQQQ
-
Technology
GDX
-
SQQQ
-
Utilities
GDX
-
SQQQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDX vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
GDX
SQQQ
GDX vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDX | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 0.76 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | -0.93 | +2.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.32 | -1.69 | +6.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDX | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | -1.22 | +2.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | -0.72 | +1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | -0.84 | +1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | -0.87 | +0.99 |
Drawdowns
GDX vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDX drawdown since its inception was -80.34%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDX and SQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDX | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.34% | -100.00% | +19.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.09% | -65.71% | +33.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.09% | -92.38% | +60.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.51% | -97.23% | +50.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.79% | -99.98% | +50.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.09% | -100.00% | +67.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.43% | -92.40% | +51.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.42% | 35.98% | -23.56% |
Volatility
GDX vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) is 16.05%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 19.65%. This indicates that GDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDX | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.05% | 19.65% | -3.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.61% | 39.23% | -0.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.36% | 50.16% | -3.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.61% | 66.95% | -30.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.27% | 66.30% | -29.03% |
GDX vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than SQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDX vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison
GDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than SQQQ's 11.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | 0.80% | 0.74% | 1.19% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 11.25% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDX and SQQQ have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SQQQ has higher volatility (19.65%) compared to GDX (16.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDX dropped -80.34% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.
On 10-year performance, GDX leads with 12.82% vs -55.68% for SQQQ. On fees, GDX is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, GDX has been the lower-risk option at 16.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GDX has performed better with a 12.82% return vs -55.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GDX is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SQQQ.
SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 11.25%, compared with 0.80% for GDX.
GDX is categorized as Gold, while SQQQ is Leveraged Equities. GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index, while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for GDX and 0.95% for SQQQ.
GDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs -1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDX and SQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer