GDX vs. PBD
GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) and PBD (Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDX is a Gold fund tracking the NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index, while PBD is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GDX returned 13.81%/yr vs 9.10%/yr for PBD. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GDX charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PBD.
Performance
GDX vs. PBD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDX achieves a -0.58% return, which is significantly lower than PBD's 28.03% return. Over the past 10 years, GDX has outperformed PBD with an annualized return of 13.81%, while PBD has yielded a comparatively lower 9.10% annualized return.
GDX
- 1D
- 6.55%
- 1M
- -2.38%
- YTD
- -0.58%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 57.71%
- 3Y*
- 41.18%
- 5Y*
- 19.97%
- 10Y*
- 13.81%
PBD
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- -3.12%
- YTD
- 28.03%
- 6M
- 27.73%
- 1Y
- 72.58%
- 3Y*
- 4.61%
- 5Y*
- -5.27%
- 10Y*
- 9.10%
GDX vs. PBD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | -0.58% | 154.77% | 10.63% | 9.98% | -9.01% | -9.52% | 23.66% | 39.84% | -8.77% | 11.99% |
PBD Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF | 28.03% | 43.65% | -26.39% | -10.69% | -29.70% | -22.30% | 145.46% | 40.00% | -19.32% | 28.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDX and PBD is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2007 | 0.30 |
The correlation between GDX and PBD shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (10 years) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDX vs. PBD — Risk / Return Rank
GDX
PBD
GDX vs. PBD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDX | PBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.47 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 5.71 | -4.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.39 | 19.24 | -14.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDX vs. PBD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDX drawdown since its inception was -80.34%, roughly equal to the maximum PBD drawdown of -78.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDX and PBD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDX | PBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.34% | -78.60% | -1.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.28% | -12.78% | -23.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.28% | -52.45% | +16.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.51% | -69.15% | +22.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.79% | -75.40% | +25.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.39% | -43.63% | +17.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.41% | -53.37% | +12.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.22% | 3.78% | +9.44% |
Volatility
GDX vs. PBD - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a higher volatility of 18.56% compared to Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) at 10.96%. This indicates that GDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDX | PBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.56% | 10.96% | +7.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.52% | 19.02% | +20.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.30% | 24.81% | +22.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.86% | 28.59% | +8.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.37% | 27.35% | +10.02% |
GDX vs. PBD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than PBD's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDX vs. PBD - Dividend Comparison
GDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than PBD's 1.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | 0.74% | 0.74% | 1.19% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% |
PBD Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF | 1.76% | 2.71% | 1.81% | 2.85% | 2.98% | 0.67% | 0.48% | 1.83% | 1.86% | 1.76% | 2.04% | 1.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDX and PBD have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDX has higher volatility (18.56%) compared to PBD (10.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDX dropped -80.34% vs PBD's -78.60%.
On 10-year performance, GDX leads with 13.81% vs 9.10% for PBD. On fees, GDX is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, PBD has been the lower-risk option at 10.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GDX has performed better with a 13.81% return vs 9.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GDX is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PBD.
PBD has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 0.74% for GDX.
GDX is categorized as Gold, while PBD is Alternative Energy Equities. GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index, while PBD tracks WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for GDX and 0.75% for PBD.
PBD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDX and PBD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer