GDT vs. TRTY
GDT (WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund) and TRTY (Cambria Trinity ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. GDT is actively managed, while TRTY is passively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GDT charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for TRTY.
Performance
GDT vs. TRTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GDT
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -2.50%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TRTY
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- 6M
- 5.91%
- YTD
- 8.65%
- 1Y
- 19.08%
- 3Y*
- 10.76%
- 5Y*
- 5.96%
- 10Y*
- —
GDT vs. TRTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | -14.24% |
TRTY Cambria Trinity ETF | 3.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDT and TRTY is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDT vs. TRTY — Risk / Return Rank
GDT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TRTY
GDT vs. TRTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT) and Cambria Trinity ETF (TRTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDT | TRTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.37 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.50 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.50 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDT vs. TRTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDT drawdown since its inception was -24.66%, which is greater than TRTY's maximum drawdown of -22.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDT and TRTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDT | TRTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.66% | -22.35% | -2.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.43% | -1.94% | -20.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.26% | -4.14% | -8.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.53% | — |
Volatility
GDT vs. TRTY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDT | TRTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.72% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.66% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.91% | 10.04% | +21.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.91% | 10.55% | +21.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.91% | 10.41% | +21.50% |
GDT vs. TRTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than TRTY's 0.44% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDT vs. TRTY - Dividend Comparison
GDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, less than TRTY's 2.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | 2.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TRTY Cambria Trinity ETF | 2.91% | 2.86% | 3.55% | 3.24% | 5.17% | 4.52% | 1.99% | 2.64% | 1.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDT and TRTY have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for TRTY.
TRTY has the higher dividend yield at 2.91%, compared with 2.70% for GDT.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GDT and 0.44% for TRTY.
Find the right allocation for GDT and TRTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer