GDT vs. TDSB
GDT (WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund) and TDSB (Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GDT charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for TDSB.
Performance
GDT vs. TDSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GDT
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -1.71%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TDSB
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 4.54%
- 6M
- 4.50%
- 1Y
- 14.83%
- 3Y*
- 8.77%
- 5Y*
- 2.16%
- 10Y*
- —
GDT vs. TDSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | -8.05% |
TDSB Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF | 2.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDT and TDSB is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2026 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDT vs. TDSB — Risk / Return Rank
GDT
TDSB
GDT vs. TDSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT) and Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF (TDSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDT | TDSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.63 | 0.31 | -0.94 |
Drawdowns
GDT vs. TDSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDT drawdown since its inception was -18.06%, smaller than the maximum TDSB drawdown of -19.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDT and TDSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDT | TDSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.06% | -19.56% | +1.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.07% | -0.90% | -15.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.90% | -9.12% | -0.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.17% | — |
Volatility
GDT vs. TDSB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDT | TDSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.64% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.01% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.36% | 5.98% | +27.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.36% | 7.32% | +26.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.36% | 7.53% | +25.83% |
GDT vs. TDSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than TDSB's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDT vs. TDSB - Dividend Comparison
GDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than TDSB's 2.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | 1.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDSB Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF | 2.13% | 1.93% | 3.50% | 2.77% | 1.81% | 1.75% | 0.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDT and TDSB have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for TDSB.
TDSB has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 1.77% for GDT.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GDT and 0.69% for TDSB.
Find the right allocation for GDT and TDSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer