GDT vs. RHRX
GDT (WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund) and RHRX (RH Tactical Rotation ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GDT charges 0.30%/yr vs 1.36%/yr for RHRX.
Performance
GDT vs. RHRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GDT
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -1.79%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RHRX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 5.51%
- YTD
- 21.23%
- 6M
- 21.28%
- 1Y
- 40.56%
- 3Y*
- 22.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDT vs. RHRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | -7.53% |
RHRX RH Tactical Rotation ETF | 19.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDT and RHRX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2026 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDT vs. RHRX — Risk / Return Rank
GDT
RHRX
GDT vs. RHRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT) and RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDT | RHRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.58 | 0.53 | -1.11 |
Drawdowns
GDT vs. RHRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDT drawdown since its inception was -18.06%, smaller than the maximum RHRX drawdown of -25.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDT and RHRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDT | RHRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.06% | -25.33% | +7.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.59% | -0.40% | -15.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.96% | -8.95% | -1.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.74% | — |
Volatility
GDT vs. RHRX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDT | RHRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.72% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.20% | 13.18% | +20.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.20% | 19.03% | +14.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.20% | 19.03% | +14.17% |
GDT vs. RHRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than RHRX's 1.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDT vs. RHRX - Dividend Comparison
GDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, while RHRX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | 1.76% |
RHRX RH Tactical Rotation ETF | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDT and RHRX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.36% for RHRX.
GDT has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 0.00% for RHRX.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Adaptive. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GDT and 1.36% for RHRX.
Find the right allocation for GDT and RHRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer