GDT vs. DHS
GDT (WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund) and DHS (WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - GDT is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while DHS is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index. GDT is actively managed, while DHS is passively managed. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GDT charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for DHS.
Performance
GDT vs. DHS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GDT
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -2.50%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DHS
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- 6M
- 12.03%
- YTD
- 14.63%
- 1Y
- 21.30%
- 3Y*
- 16.90%
- 5Y*
- 12.01%
- 10Y*
- 9.35%
GDT vs. DHS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | -14.24% |
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund | 9.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDT and DHS is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDT vs. DHS — Risk / Return Rank
GDT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DHS
GDT vs. DHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDT | DHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.34 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.25 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.79 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDT vs. DHS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDT drawdown since its inception was -24.66%, smaller than the maximum DHS drawdown of -67.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDT and DHS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDT | DHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.66% | -67.25% | +42.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.43% | -0.67% | -21.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.26% | -9.51% | -2.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.74% | — |
Volatility
GDT vs. DHS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDT | DHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.25% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.64% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.91% | 10.20% | +21.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.91% | 13.87% | +18.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.91% | 16.06% | +15.85% |
GDT vs. DHS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than DHS's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDT vs. DHS - Dividend Comparison
GDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, less than DHS's 3.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund | 3.15% | 3.32% | 3.66% | 4.31% | 3.42% | 3.29% | 4.14% | 3.69% | 3.76% | 3.00% | 3.25% | 3.53% |
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | 2.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDT and DHS have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for DHS.
DHS has the higher dividend yield at 3.15%, compared with 2.70% for GDT.
GDT is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while DHS is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GDT and 0.38% for DHS.
Find the right allocation for GDT and DHS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer