PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDT vs. AMJB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDT vs. AMJB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT) and Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GDT

1D
-0.85%
1M
-1.71%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMJB

1D
1.62%
1M
-1.98%
YTD
17.69%
6M
15.52%
1Y
15.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDT vs. AMJB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GDT and AMJB is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2026

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDT vs. AMJB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDT

AMJB
AMJB Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
AMJB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMJB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMJB Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
AMJB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMJB Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDT vs. AMJB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT) and Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GDT vs. AMJB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GDTAMJBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.63

0.70

-1.32

Drawdowns

GDT vs. AMJB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDT drawdown since its inception was -18.06%, roughly equal to the maximum AMJB drawdown of -17.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDT and AMJB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDTAMJBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.06%

-17.70%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.07%

-6.06%

-10.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.90%

-4.98%

-4.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

Volatility

GDT vs. AMJB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDTAMJBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.36%

15.37%

+17.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.36%

18.19%

+15.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.36%

18.19%

+15.17%

GDT vs. AMJB - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than AMJB's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

GDT vs. AMJB - Dividend Comparison

GDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, while AMJB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


GDT and AMJB have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GDT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GDT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for AMJB.

GDT has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 0.00% for AMJB.

GDT is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while AMJB is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GDT and 0.85% for AMJB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDT and AMJB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer