GDT vs. AMJB
GDT (WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund) and AMJB (Alerian MLP Index ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - GDT is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while AMJB is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian MLP Index. GDT is actively managed, while AMJB is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. GDT charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for AMJB.
Performance
GDT vs. AMJB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GDT
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -1.71%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMJB
- 1D
- 1.62%
- 1M
- -1.98%
- YTD
- 17.69%
- 6M
- 15.52%
- 1Y
- 15.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDT vs. AMJB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | -8.05% |
AMJB Alerian MLP Index ETN | 10.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDT and AMJB is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2026 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDT vs. AMJB — Risk / Return Rank
GDT
AMJB
GDT vs. AMJB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT) and Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDT | AMJB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.63 | 0.70 | -1.32 |
Drawdowns
GDT vs. AMJB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDT drawdown since its inception was -18.06%, roughly equal to the maximum AMJB drawdown of -17.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDT and AMJB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDT | AMJB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.06% | -17.70% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.07% | -6.06% | -10.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.90% | -4.98% | -4.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.34% | — |
Volatility
GDT vs. AMJB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDT | AMJB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.66% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.18% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.36% | 15.37% | +17.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.36% | 18.19% | +15.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.36% | 18.19% | +15.17% |
GDT vs. AMJB - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than AMJB's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDT vs. AMJB - Dividend Comparison
GDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, while AMJB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
AMJB Alerian MLP Index ETN | 0.00% |
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | 1.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDT and AMJB have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for AMJB.
GDT has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 0.00% for AMJB.
GDT is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while AMJB is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GDT and 0.85% for AMJB.
Find the right allocation for GDT and AMJB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer