PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMJB vs. AMLP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AMJB vs. AMLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AMJB vs. AMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AMJB
Alerian MLP Index ETN
17.28%7.91%17.90%
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
14.20%5.78%16.70%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMJB achieves a 17.28% return, which is significantly higher than AMLP's 14.20% return.


AMJB

1D
-1.43%
1M
1.59%
YTD
17.28%
6M
20.78%
1Y
13.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMLP

1D
-1.16%
1M
1.15%
YTD
14.20%
6M
16.89%
1Y
9.93%
3Y*
20.27%
5Y*
20.38%
10Y*
8.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AMJB vs. AMLP - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMJB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than AMLP's 0.90% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AMJB vs. AMLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMJB
AMJB Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
AMJB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMJB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMJB Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
AMJB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMJB Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

AMLP
AMLP Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
AMLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMLP Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
AMLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMLP Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMJB vs. AMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMJBAMLPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.67

0.62

+0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.99

0.89

+0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.13

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.76

0.68

+0.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.01

1.72

+0.29

AMJB vs. AMLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMJB Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is comparable to the AMLP Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMJB and AMLP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMJBAMLPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

0.62

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.15

0.22

+0.93

Correlation

The correlation between AMJB and AMLP is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

AMJB vs. AMLP - Dividend Comparison

AMJB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%, less than AMLP's 7.54% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMJB
Alerian MLP Index ETN
5.71%6.52%5.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
7.54%8.36%7.70%7.86%7.70%8.55%12.31%9.12%9.29%7.97%8.09%9.84%

Drawdowns

AMJB vs. AMLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMJB drawdown since its inception was -16.98%, smaller than the maximum AMLP drawdown of -77.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMJB and AMLP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AMJBAMLPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.98%

-77.19%

+60.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.98%

-14.27%

-2.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.00%

-2.17%

-0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.71%

-17.57%

+13.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.38%

5.60%

+0.78%

Volatility

AMJB vs. AMLP - Volatility Comparison

Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB) has a higher volatility of 3.70% compared to Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) at 2.92%. This indicates that AMJB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AMJBAMLPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

2.92%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.23%

7.86%

+2.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.11%

16.08%

+4.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.74%

20.18%

-2.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.74%

27.84%

-10.10%