AMJB vs. MLPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX).
AMJB and MLPX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AMJB is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the Alerian MLP Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2024. MLPX is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Aug 7, 2013. Both AMJB and MLPX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AMJB or MLPX.
Key characteristics
| AMJB | MLPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Daily Std Dev | 14.52% | 13.84% |
| Max Drawdown | -8.44% | -70.61% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.74% | -0.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMJB and MLPX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
AMJB vs. MLPX - Performance Comparison
The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AMJB vs. MLPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMJB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AMJB vs. MLPX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Not enough dataDividends
AMJB vs. MLPX - Dividend Comparison
AMJB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, more than MLPX's 4.36% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMJB Alerian MLP Index ETN | 4.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.36% | 5.22% | 5.23% | 5.98% | 8.32% | 5.78% | 5.98% | 4.36% | 5.50% | 4.81% | 2.15% | 0.68% |
Drawdowns
AMJB vs. MLPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMJB drawdown since its inception was -8.44%, smaller than the maximum MLPX drawdown of -70.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMJB and MLPX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AMJB vs. MLPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB) is 4.04%, while Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) has a volatility of 4.32%. This indicates that AMJB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.