AMJB vs. MLPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX).
AMJB and MLPX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AMJB is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the Alerian MLP Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2024. MLPX is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Aug 7, 2013. Both AMJB and MLPX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
AMJB vs. MLPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AMJB vs. MLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AMJB Alerian MLP Index ETN | 17.28% | 7.91% | 17.90% |
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 23.52% | 4.96% | 41.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMJB achieves a 17.28% return, which is significantly lower than MLPX's 23.52% return.
AMJB
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 17.28%
- 6M
- 20.78%
- 1Y
- 13.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MLPX
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 3.80%
- YTD
- 23.52%
- 6M
- 20.89%
- 1Y
- 21.69%
- 3Y*
- 29.25%
- 5Y*
- 24.62%
- 10Y*
- 14.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AMJB vs. MLPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMJB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AMJB vs. MLPX — Risk / Return Rank
AMJB
MLPX
AMJB vs. MLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMJB | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.67 | 1.15 | -0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.99 | 1.51 | -0.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.23 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | 1.44 | -0.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.01 | 4.48 | -2.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMJB | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 1.15 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | 0.36 | +0.79 |
Correlation
The correlation between AMJB and MLPX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AMJB vs. MLPX - Dividend Comparison
AMJB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%, more than MLPX's 4.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMJB Alerian MLP Index ETN | 5.71% | 6.52% | 5.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.06% | 4.88% | 4.30% | 5.22% | 5.23% | 5.98% | 8.32% | 5.78% | 5.77% | 4.36% | 5.50% | 4.81% |
Drawdowns
AMJB vs. MLPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMJB drawdown since its inception was -16.98%, smaller than the maximum MLPX drawdown of -70.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMJB and MLPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMJB | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.98% | -70.67% | +53.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.98% | -14.92% | -2.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -64.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.00% | -2.01% | -0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.71% | -16.81% | +13.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.38% | 4.81% | +1.57% |
Volatility
AMJB vs. MLPX - Volatility Comparison
Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) have volatilities of 3.70% and 3.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AMJB | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.70% | 3.63% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.23% | 10.35% | -0.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.11% | 18.88% | +1.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.74% | 20.00% | -2.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.74% | 26.59% | -8.85% |