GDMYX vs. QBDSX
Compare and contrast key facts about GuideStone Funds Defensive Market Strategies Fund (GDMYX) and Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX).
GDMYX is managed by GuideStone Funds. It was launched on Aug 31, 2011. QBDSX is managed by Advisors Preferred. It was launched on Aug 8, 2013.
Performance
GDMYX vs. QBDSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GDMYX vs. QBDSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDMYX GuideStone Funds Defensive Market Strategies Fund | -2.47% | 10.46% | 11.71% | 11.43% | -25.87% | 12.14% | 10.04% | 19.79% | -2.69% | 11.51% |
QBDSX Quantified Managed Income Fund | -0.38% | 5.11% | 1.02% | 2.25% | -4.09% | -0.66% | -9.22% | 10.50% | -3.17% | 5.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDMYX achieves a -2.47% return, which is significantly lower than QBDSX's -0.38% return. Over the past 10 years, GDMYX has outperformed QBDSX with an annualized return of 5.01%, while QBDSX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.87% annualized return.
GDMYX
- 1D
- 1.96%
- 1M
- -3.38%
- YTD
- -2.47%
- 6M
- -0.46%
- 1Y
- 9.31%
- 3Y*
- 9.25%
- 5Y*
- 1.49%
- 10Y*
- 5.01%
QBDSX
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- -0.38%
- 6M
- -1.53%
- 1Y
- 2.25%
- 3Y*
- 2.73%
- 5Y*
- 0.90%
- 10Y*
- 0.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GDMYX vs. QBDSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDMYX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than QBDSX's 1.31% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GDMYX vs. QBDSX — Risk / Return Rank
GDMYX
QBDSX
GDMYX vs. QBDSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Defensive Market Strategies Fund (GDMYX) and Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDMYX | QBDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.89 | 0.60 | +0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.33 | 0.87 | +0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.11 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 0.89 | +0.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.41 | 3.43 | +2.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDMYX | QBDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 0.60 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.21 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.17 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.15 | +0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between GDMYX and QBDSX is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GDMYX vs. QBDSX - Dividend Comparison
GDMYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.48%, more than QBDSX's 4.49% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDMYX GuideStone Funds Defensive Market Strategies Fund | 10.48% | 10.22% | 10.00% | 2.28% | 0.00% | 10.65% | 3.09% | 5.76% | 5.36% | 4.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QBDSX Quantified Managed Income Fund | 4.49% | 4.47% | 3.98% | 4.51% | 0.54% | 0.71% | 0.87% | 2.26% | 2.04% | 2.51% | 1.00% | 3.89% |
Drawdowns
GDMYX vs. QBDSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDMYX drawdown since its inception was -29.89%, which is greater than QBDSX's maximum drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDMYX and QBDSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDMYX | QBDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.89% | -18.38% | -11.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.71% | -3.09% | -4.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.89% | -7.40% | -22.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.89% | -18.38% | -11.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.11% | -8.41% | +4.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.76% | -6.83% | +1.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 0.80% | +0.79% |
Volatility
GDMYX vs. QBDSX - Volatility Comparison
GuideStone Funds Defensive Market Strategies Fund (GDMYX) has a higher volatility of 3.63% compared to Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX) at 1.40%. This indicates that GDMYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QBDSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GDMYX | QBDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 1.40% | +2.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.20% | 2.77% | +3.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.85% | 3.77% | +7.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.42% | 4.32% | +8.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.24% | 5.26% | +6.98% |