PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDMYX vs. GLDYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDMYX vs. GLDYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds Defensive Market Strategies Fund (GDMYX) and GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund (GLDYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDMYX achieves a 6.31% return, which is significantly higher than GLDYX's 0.65% return. Over the past 10 years, GDMYX has outperformed GLDYX with an annualized return of 5.70%, while GLDYX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.27% annualized return.


GDMYX

1D
0.08%
1M
3.49%
YTD
6.31%
6M
6.52%
1Y
16.04%
3Y*
11.73%
5Y*
2.77%
10Y*
5.70%

GLDYX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.23%
YTD
0.65%
6M
1.04%
1Y
4.08%
3Y*
4.89%
5Y*
2.13%
10Y*
2.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDMYX vs. GLDYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GDMYX
GuideStone Funds Defensive Market Strategies Fund
6.31%10.46%11.71%11.43%-25.87%12.14%10.04%19.79%-2.69%11.51%
GLDYX
GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund
0.65%5.66%4.81%5.09%-4.42%-0.47%3.39%4.00%1.83%1.69%

Correlation

The correlation between GDMYX and GLDYX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2012

0.05

Over the past year, GDMYX and GLDYX have become more correlated (0.27) than their long-term average of 0.05, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDMYX vs. GLDYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDMYX
GDMYX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
GDMYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDMYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDMYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
GDMYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDMYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDYX
GLDYX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
GLDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDMYX vs. GLDYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Defensive Market Strategies Fund (GDMYX) and GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund (GLDYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GDMYXGLDYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.71

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

3.95

-1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.47

16.50

-3.03

GDMYX vs. GLDYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDMYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the GLDYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDMYX and GLDYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GDMYXGLDYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

2.97

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

1.17

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

1.47

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.66

-0.14

Drawdowns

GDMYX vs. GLDYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDMYX drawdown since its inception was -29.89%, which is greater than GLDYX's maximum drawdown of -11.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDMYX and GLDYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDMYXGLDYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.89%

-11.73%

-18.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.95%

-1.04%

-4.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.58%

-1.04%

-15.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.89%

-6.68%

-23.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.89%

-6.68%

-23.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.10%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.69%

-2.16%

-3.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.22%

0.25%

+0.97%

Volatility

GDMYX vs. GLDYX - Volatility Comparison

GuideStone Funds Defensive Market Strategies Fund (GDMYX) has a higher volatility of 1.59% compared to GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund (GLDYX) at 0.44%. This indicates that GDMYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDMYXGLDYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.59%

0.44%

+1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.67%

1.01%

+4.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.37%

1.38%

+5.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.42%

1.82%

+10.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.24%

1.55%

+10.69%

GDMYX vs. GLDYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDMYX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDYX's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

GDMYX vs. GLDYX - Dividend Comparison

GDMYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.61%, more than GLDYX's 4.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDMYX
GuideStone Funds Defensive Market Strategies Fund
9.61%10.22%10.00%2.28%0.00%10.65%3.09%5.76%5.36%4.63%0.00%0.00%
GLDYX
GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund
4.10%4.32%4.31%3.36%1.72%1.02%1.70%2.49%2.87%1.60%1.66%1.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


GDMYX and GLDYX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDMYX has higher volatility (1.59%) compared to GLDYX (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDMYX dropped -29.89% vs GLDYX's -11.73%.

GLDYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDMYX and GLDYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer