GDMYX vs. GGBFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GDMYX (GuideStone Funds Defensive Market Strategies Fund) and GGBFX (GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - GDMYX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by GuideStone Funds, while GGBFX is a Global Bonds fund managed by GuideStone Funds. Over the past 10 years, GDMYX returned 5.70%/yr vs 1.75%/yr for GGBFX. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GDMYX charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for GGBFX.

Performance

GDMYX vs. GGBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds Defensive Market Strategies Fund (GDMYX) and GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund (GGBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDMYX achieves a 6.31% return, which is significantly higher than GGBFX's 0.38% return. Over the past 10 years, GDMYX has outperformed GGBFX with an annualized return of 5.70%, while GGBFX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.75% annualized return.

GDMYX

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 3.49%
• YTD: 6.31%
• 6M: 6.52%
• 1Y: 16.04%
• 3Y*: 11.73%
• 5Y*: 2.77%
• 10Y*: 5.70%

GGBFX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.51%
• YTD: 0.38%
• 6M: 0.60%
• 1Y: 4.05%
• 3Y*: 4.38%
• 5Y*: -0.51%
• 10Y*: 1.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDMYX vs. GGBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GDMYX GuideStone Funds Defensive Market Strategies Fund	6.31%	10.46%	11.71%	11.43%	-25.87%	12.14%	10.04%	19.79%	-2.69%	11.51%
GGBFX GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund	0.38%	7.55%	0.40%	5.77%	-13.90%	-2.57%	5.03%	11.04%	-4.74%	7.69%

Correlation

The correlation between GDMYX and GGBFX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.33
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2012	0.32

The correlation between GDMYX and GGBFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (10 years) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GDMYX vs. GGBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDMYX

GDMYX Risk / Return Rank: 59
GDMYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
GDMYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
GDMYX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
GDMYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
GDMYX Martin Ratio Rank: 70

GGBFX

GGBFX Risk / Return Rank: 12
GGBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
GGBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
GGBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
GGBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
GGBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDMYX vs. GGBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Defensive Market Strategies Fund (GDMYX) and GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund (GGBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GDMYX	GGBFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	0.97	+1.27
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	1.43	+1.73
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.17	+0.26
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.77	1.04	+1.73
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.47	3.30	+10.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GDMYX vs. GGBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDMYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the GGBFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDMYX and GGBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GDMYX	GGBFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.24	0.97	+1.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22	-0.10	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	0.39	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.71	-0.18

Drawdowns

GDMYX vs. GGBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDMYX drawdown since its inception was -29.89%, which is greater than GGBFX's maximum drawdown of -27.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDMYX and GGBFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GDMYX	GGBFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.89%	-27.03%	-2.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.95%	-3.80%	-2.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.58%	-6.01%	-10.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.89%	-20.84%	-9.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.89%	-20.97%	-8.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.85%	+3.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.69%	-4.64%	-1.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.22%	1.19%	+0.03%

Volatility

GDMYX vs. GGBFX - Volatility Comparison

GuideStone Funds Defensive Market Strategies Fund (GDMYX) has a higher volatility of 1.59% compared to GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund (GGBFX) at 1.50%. This indicates that GDMYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GDMYX	GGBFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.59%	1.50%	+0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.67%	3.15%	+2.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.37%	4.07%	+3.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.42%	4.97%	+7.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.24%	4.51%	+7.73%

GDMYX vs. GGBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDMYX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than GGBFX's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

GDMYX vs. GGBFX - Dividend Comparison

GDMYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.61%, more than GGBFX's 3.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GDMYX GuideStone Funds Defensive Market Strategies Fund	9.61%	10.22%	10.00%	2.28%	0.00%	10.65%	3.09%	5.76%	5.36%	4.63%	0.00%	0.00%
GGBFX GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund	3.05%	3.05%	2.88%	1.10%	0.95%	3.55%	1.44%	3.29%	3.13%	3.45%	3.96%	4.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GDMYX and GGBFX in my portfolio?

GDMYX and GGBFX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GDMYX or GGBFX?

GDMYX has higher volatility (1.59%) compared to GGBFX (1.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDMYX dropped -29.89% vs GGBFX's -27.03%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GDMYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.