GDMN vs. EAT

Last updated Jun 21, 2026

GDMN (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund) is Commodities fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while EAT (Brinker International, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, GDMN returned 56.96%/yr vs 65.48%/yr for EAT. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

GDMN vs. EAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) and Brinker International, Inc. (EAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDMN achieves a -11.31% return, which is significantly lower than EAT's 14.89% return.

GDMN

• 1D: -2.56%
• 1M: -10.55%
• YTD: -11.31%
• 6M: -13.58%
• 1Y: 65.62%
• 3Y*: 56.96%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EAT

• 1D: 3.84%
• 1M: 20.74%
• YTD: 14.89%
• 6M: 10.34%
• 1Y: -7.70%
• 3Y*: 65.48%
• 5Y*: 24.33%
• 10Y*: 15.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDMN vs. EAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	-11.31%	237.09%	28.23%	12.97%	-14.62%	6.93%
EAT Brinker International, Inc.	14.89%	8.49%	206.37%	35.32%	-12.79%	1.84%

Correlation

The correlation between GDMN and EAT is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2021	0.10

Return for Risk

GDMN vs. EAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDMN

GDMN Risk / Return Rank: 29
GDMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
GDMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
GDMN Omega Ratio Rank: 33
GDMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
GDMN Martin Ratio Rank: 26

EAT

EAT Risk / Return Rank: 35
EAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
EAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
EAT Omega Ratio Rank: 33
EAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
EAT Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDMN vs. EAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) and Brinker International, Inc. (EAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GDMN	EAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.00	-0.16	+1.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.47	0.10	+1.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.01	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.31	-0.17	+1.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.42	-0.35	+3.77

GDMN vs. EAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDMN Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is higher than the EAT Sharpe Ratio of -0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDMN and EAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GDMN vs. EAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDMN drawdown since its inception was -52.82%, smaller than the maximum EAT drawdown of -88.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDMN and EAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	GDMN	EAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.82%	-88.40%	+35.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-48.76%	-44.41%	-4.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-48.76%	-45.92%	-2.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-65.54%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-84.94%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-41.78%	-12.82%	-28.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.09%	-24.33%	+5.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.58%	21.85%	-3.27%

Volatility

GDMN vs. EAT - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a higher volatility of 22.11% compared to Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) at 12.45%. This indicates that GDMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GDMN	EAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.11%	12.45%	+9.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	54.94%	36.42%	+18.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	63.83%	47.11%	+16.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	48.18%	49.03%	-0.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.18%	55.16%	-6.98%

Dividends

GDMN vs. EAT - Dividend Comparison

GDMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, while EAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EAT Brinker International, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.67%	3.62%	3.46%	3.71%	2.67%	2.50%
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	3.05%	2.70%	9.44%	7.69%	1.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GDMN and EAT in my portfolio?

GDMN and EAT have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GDMN or EAT?

GDMN has higher volatility (22.11%) compared to EAT (12.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDMN dropped -52.82% vs EAT's -88.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GDMN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.