GDMN vs. CLS.TO
GDMN (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund) is Commodities fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while CLS.TO (Celestica Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, GDMN returned 56.96%/yr vs 192.86%/yr for CLS.TO. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GDMN vs. CLS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GDMN is traded in USD, while CLS.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CLS.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDMN achieves a -11.31% return, which is significantly lower than CLS.TO's 25.33% return.
GDMN
- 1D
- -2.56%
- 1M
- -10.55%
- YTD
- -11.31%
- 6M
- -13.58%
- 1Y
- 65.62%
- 3Y*
- 56.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLS.TO
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 4.72%
- YTD
- 25.33%
- 6M
- 25.66%
- 1Y
- 173.76%
- 3Y*
- 192.86%
- 5Y*
- 116.47%
- 10Y*
- 43.15%
GDMN vs. CLS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund | -11.31% | 237.09% | 28.23% | 12.97% | -14.62% | 6.93% |
CLS.TO Celestica Inc. | 25.33% | 220.69% | 215.14% | 160.52% | 1.78% | 4.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDMN and CLS.TO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2021 | 0.14 |
The correlation between GDMN and CLS.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDMN vs. CLS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
GDMN
CLS.TO
GDMN vs. CLS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) and Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDMN | CLS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.34 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 5.81 | -4.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.42 | 14.05 | -10.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDMN vs. CLS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDMN drawdown since its inception was -52.82%, smaller than the maximum CLS.TO drawdown of -80.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDMN and CLS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDMN | CLS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.82% | -80.63% | +27.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.76% | -29.56% | -19.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.76% | -53.42% | +4.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -53.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -80.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.78% | -21.23% | -20.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.09% | -26.17% | +7.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.58% | 12.21% | +6.37% |
Volatility
GDMN vs. CLS.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) is 22.11%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO) has a volatility of 27.13%. This indicates that GDMN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDMN | CLS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.11% | 27.13% | -5.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.94% | 53.58% | +1.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.83% | 72.06% | -8.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.18% | 56.86% | -8.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.18% | 49.44% | -1.26% |
Dividends
GDMN vs. CLS.TO - Dividend Comparison
GDMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, while CLS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLS.TO Celestica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund | 3.05% | 2.70% | 9.44% | 7.69% | 1.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDMN and CLS.TO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GDMN and CLS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer