GDLC vs. HERO
GDLC (Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF) and HERO (Global X Video Games & Esports ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDLC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CoinDesk 5 Index, while HERO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive Video Games & Esports Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GDLC returned 2.21%/yr vs -3.62%/yr for HERO. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GDLC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HERO.
Performance
GDLC vs. HERO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDLC achieves a -28.93% return, which is significantly lower than HERO's -13.80% return.
GDLC
- 1D
- -3.29%
- 1M
- -18.37%
- YTD
- -28.93%
- 6M
- -33.67%
- 1Y
- -33.81%
- 3Y*
- 64.48%
- 5Y*
- 2.21%
- 10Y*
- —
HERO
- 1D
- -2.41%
- 1M
- -2.63%
- YTD
- -13.80%
- 6M
- -16.14%
- 1Y
- -12.41%
- 3Y*
- 9.75%
- 5Y*
- -3.62%
- 10Y*
- —
GDLC vs. HERO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDLC Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF | -28.93% | 0.45% | 136.98% | 353.26% | -84.21% | 27.43% | 233.86% | -5.00% |
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | -13.80% | 28.74% | 17.65% | 8.36% | -33.42% | -8.37% | 91.02% | 5.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDLC and HERO is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2019 | 0.30 |
The correlation between GDLC and HERO shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (3 years) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDLC vs. HERO — Risk / Return Rank
GDLC
HERO
GDLC vs. HERO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC) and Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDLC | HERO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 0.91 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.64 | -0.47 | -0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.09 | -0.88 | -0.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDLC | HERO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.70 | -0.64 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | -0.16 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.38 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
GDLC vs. HERO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDLC drawdown since its inception was -94.14%, which is greater than HERO's maximum drawdown of -54.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDLC and HERO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDLC | HERO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.14% | -54.02% | -40.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.91% | -26.64% | -26.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.91% | -26.64% | -26.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.14% | -48.44% | -45.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.28% | -27.46% | -26.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.73% | -25.97% | -26.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.04% | 14.11% | +16.93% |
Volatility
GDLC vs. HERO - Volatility Comparison
Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC) has a higher volatility of 9.78% compared to Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) at 5.13%. This indicates that GDLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HERO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDLC | HERO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.78% | 5.13% | +4.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.66% | 15.10% | +21.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.54% | 19.52% | +29.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.43% | 23.37% | +51.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 93.91% | 24.50% | +69.41% |
GDLC vs. HERO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDLC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than HERO's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDLC vs. HERO - Dividend Comparison
GDLC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HERO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDLC Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | 1.88% | 1.62% | 1.06% | 0.73% | 0.28% | 0.79% | 0.71% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDLC and HERO have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDLC has higher volatility (9.78%) compared to HERO (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDLC dropped -94.14% vs HERO's -54.02%.
On 5-year performance, GDLC leads with 2.21% vs -3.62% for HERO. On fees, HERO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, HERO has been the lower-risk option at 5.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GDLC has performed better with a 2.21% return vs -3.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HERO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for GDLC.
HERO has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 0.00% for GDLC.
GDLC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while HERO is Large Cap Growth Equities. GDLC tracks CoinDesk 5 Index, while HERO tracks Solactive Video Games & Esports Index. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GDLC and 0.50% for HERO.
HERO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.64 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDLC and HERO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer