GDLC vs. WGMI

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

GDLC (Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF) and WGMI (CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. GDLC is passively managed, while WGMI is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, GDLC returned 46.90%/yr vs 49.81%/yr for WGMI. Their 0.64 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GDLC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for WGMI.

Performance

GDLC vs. WGMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC) and CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDLC achieves a -31.03% return, which is significantly lower than WGMI's 34.47% return.

GDLC

• 1D: -2.56%
• 1M: 2.89%
• 6M: -27.20%
• YTD: -31.03%
• 1Y: -43.01%
• 3Y*: 46.90%
• 5Y*: -0.13%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.69%

WGMI

• 1D: -2.67%
• 1M: -3.25%
• 6M: 14.20%
• YTD: 34.47%
• 1Y: 119.73%
• 3Y*: 49.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GDLC Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF	$1.03M	$1.29M	$1.41M
WGMI CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF	$36.52M	$32.75M	$41.50M

GDLC vs. WGMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
GDLC Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF	-31.03%	0.45%	136.98%	353.26%	-84.34%
WGMI CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF	34.47%	72.47%	23.54%	304.08%	-82.94%

Correlation

The correlation between GDLC and WGMI is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2022	0.64

The correlation between GDLC and WGMI shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GDLC vs. WGMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GDLC

GDLC Risk / Return Rank: 2
GDLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
GDLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
GDLC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
GDLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
GDLC Martin Ratio Rank: 3

WGMI

WGMI Risk / Return Rank: 51
WGMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
WGMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
WGMI Omega Ratio Rank: 51
WGMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
WGMI Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GDLC vs. WGMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC) and CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GDLC	WGMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.93	1.25	-2.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.36	1.95	-3.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	1.23	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.80	2.05	-2.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.21	3.96	-5.17

GDLC vs. WGMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDLC Sharpe Ratio is -0.93, which is lower than the WGMI Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDLC and WGMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GDLC vs. WGMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDLC drawdown since its inception was -94.14%, which is greater than WGMI's maximum drawdown of -85.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDLC and WGMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	GDLC	WGMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.14%	-85.76%	-8.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-57.18%	-50.94%	-6.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-57.18%	-62.79%	+5.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-94.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-55.64%	-28.63%	-27.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.83%	-41.97%	-10.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.73%	26.29%	+11.44%

Volatility

GDLC vs. WGMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC) is 9.63%, while CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI) has a volatility of 35.22%. This indicates that GDLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WGMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GDLC	WGMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.63%	35.22%	-25.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.59%	61.62%	-26.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.13%	83.14%	-34.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	71.87%	82.40%	-10.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	93.52%	82.40%	+11.12%

GDLC vs. WGMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDLC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than WGMI's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

GDLC vs. WGMI - Dividend Comparison

Neither GDLC nor WGMI has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GDLC Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WGMI CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.22%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GDLC and WGMI in my portfolio?

GDLC and WGMI have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GDLC or WGMI?

WGMI has higher volatility (35.22%) compared to GDLC (9.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDLC dropped -94.14% vs WGMI's -85.76%.

Which ETF is better, GDLC or WGMI?

On 3-year performance, WGMI leads with 49.81% vs 46.90% for GDLC. On fees, GDLC is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, GDLC has been the lower-risk option at 9.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GDLC or WGMI?

Over the 3-year period, WGMI has performed better with a 49.81% return vs 46.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GDLC or WGMI?

GDLC is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for WGMI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GDLC or WGMI?

GDLC and WGMI have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between GDLC and WGMI?

They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and CoinShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GDLC and 0.75% for WGMI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WGMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.