GDLC vs. GAVA
GDLC (Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF) and GAVA (Grayscale Avalanche Staking ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Grayscale. GDLC is passively managed, while GAVA is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GDLC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for GAVA.
Performance
GDLC vs. GAVA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GDLC
- 1D
- -3.29%
- 1M
- -18.37%
- YTD
- -28.93%
- 6M
- -33.67%
- 1Y
- -33.81%
- 3Y*
- 64.48%
- 5Y*
- 2.21%
- 10Y*
- —
GAVA
- 1D
- -3.57%
- 1M
- -12.65%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDLC vs. GAVA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GDLC Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF | -8.73% |
GAVA Grayscale Avalanche Staking ETF | -15.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDLC and GAVA is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2026 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDLC vs. GAVA — Risk / Return Rank
GDLC
GAVA
GDLC vs. GAVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC) and Grayscale Avalanche Staking ETF (GAVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDLC | GAVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.64 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.09 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDLC | GAVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | -1.09 | +1.39 |
Drawdowns
GDLC vs. GAVA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDLC drawdown since its inception was -94.14%, which is greater than GAVA's maximum drawdown of -21.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDLC and GAVA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDLC | GAVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.14% | -21.51% | -72.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.28% | -21.51% | -32.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.73% | -9.03% | -43.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.04% | — | — |
Volatility
GDLC vs. GAVA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDLC | GAVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.78% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.66% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.54% | 49.61% | -1.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.43% | 49.61% | +24.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 93.91% | 49.61% | +44.30% |
GDLC vs. GAVA - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDLC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than GAVA's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDLC vs. GAVA - Dividend Comparison
Neither GDLC nor GAVA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GDLC and GAVA have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GAVA is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GAVA is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for GDLC.
GDLC and GAVA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GDLC and 0.35% for GAVA.
Find the right allocation for GDLC and GAVA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer