PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDLC vs. GAVA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDLC vs. GAVA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC) and Grayscale Avalanche Staking ETF (GAVA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GDLC

1D
-3.29%
1M
-18.37%
YTD
-28.93%
6M
-33.67%
1Y
-33.81%
3Y*
64.48%
5Y*
2.21%
10Y*

GAVA

1D
-3.57%
1M
-12.65%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDLC vs. GAVA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GDLC and GAVA is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2026

0.83

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDLC vs. GAVA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDLC
GDLC Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
GDLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDLC Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
GDLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDLC Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

GAVA
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDLC vs. GAVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC) and Grayscale Avalanche Staking ETF (GAVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GDLCGAVADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.09

GDLC vs. GAVA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GDLCGAVADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

-1.09

+1.39

Drawdowns

GDLC vs. GAVA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDLC drawdown since its inception was -94.14%, which is greater than GAVA's maximum drawdown of -21.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDLC and GAVA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDLCGAVADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.14%

-21.51%

-72.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.28%

-21.51%

-32.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.73%

-9.03%

-43.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.04%

Volatility

GDLC vs. GAVA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDLCGAVADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.54%

49.61%

-1.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.43%

49.61%

+24.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

93.91%

49.61%

+44.30%

GDLC vs. GAVA - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDLC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than GAVA's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

GDLC vs. GAVA - Dividend Comparison

Neither GDLC nor GAVA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GDLC and GAVA have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GAVA is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GAVA is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for GDLC.

GDLC and GAVA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GDLC and 0.35% for GAVA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDLC and GAVA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer