GDIV vs. GXLC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GDIV (Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF) and GXLC (Global X U.S. 500 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. GDIV is actively managed, while GXLC is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GDIV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for GXLC.

Performance

GDIV vs. GXLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF (GDIV) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDIV achieves a 11.24% return, which is significantly higher than GXLC's 8.31% return.

GDIV

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 1.10%
• YTD: 11.24%
• 6M: 10.27%
• 1Y: 24.24%
• 3Y*: 16.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GXLC

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: -1.12%
• YTD: 8.31%
• 6M: 7.39%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDIV vs. GXLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GDIV Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF	11.24%	3.70%
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF	8.31%	3.22%

Correlation

The correlation between GDIV and GXLC is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025	0.83

Return for Risk

GDIV vs. GXLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDIV

GDIV Risk / Return Rank: 64
GDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
GDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
GDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 67
GDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
GDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 62

GXLC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDIV vs. GXLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF (GDIV) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GDIV	GXLC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.94	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.52	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.46	—	—

Drawdowns

GDIV vs. GXLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDIV drawdown since its inception was -18.93%, which is greater than GXLC's maximum drawdown of -9.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDIV and GXLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	GDIV	GXLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.93%	-9.08%	-9.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.67%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.93%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.80%	-3.05%	+2.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.14%	-1.54%	-1.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.32%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GDIV	GXLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.97%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.38%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.04%	13.85%	-1.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.28%	13.85%	+1.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.28%	13.85%	+1.43%

GDIV vs. GXLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDIV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLC's 0.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

GDIV vs. GXLC - Dividend Comparison

GDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, more than GXLC's 0.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
GDIV Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF	1.13%	1.19%	1.30%	2.27%	5.88%
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF	0.65%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GDIV and GXLC in my portfolio?

GDIV and GXLC have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GDIV or GXLC?

On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GDIV or GXLC?

GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GDIV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GDIV or GXLC?

GDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.13%, compared with 0.65% for GXLC.

What is the main difference between GDIV and GXLC?

They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GDIV and 0.02% for GXLC.