PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GDIV vs. BDGS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


GDIVBDGS
YTD Return12.79%12.74%
1Y Return22.25%19.12%
Sharpe Ratio1.862.89
Daily Std Dev11.89%6.58%
Max Drawdown-100.00%-5.38%
Current Drawdown-0.40%-0.15%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between GDIV and BDGS is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

GDIV vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GDIV having a 12.79% return and BDGS slightly lower at 12.74%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
5.79%
10.65%
GDIV
BDGS

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GDIV vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDIV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.


BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
Expense ratio chart for BDGS: current value at 0.85% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.85%
Expense ratio chart for GDIV: current value at 0.50% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.50%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GDIV vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF (GDIV) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GDIV
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GDIV, currently valued at 1.86, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.86
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GDIV, currently valued at 2.56, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.56
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GDIV, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.32
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GDIV, currently valued at 2.92, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.92
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GDIV, currently valued at 10.36, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0010.36
BDGS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BDGS, currently valued at 2.89, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.89
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BDGS, currently valued at 4.83, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.004.83
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BDGS, currently valued at 1.88, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.88
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BDGS, currently valued at 3.53, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.53
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BDGS, currently valued at 21.35, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0021.35

GDIV vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is lower than the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of GDIV and BDGS.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00May 19May 26Jun 02Jun 09Jun 16Jun 23Jun 30Jul 07Jul 14Jul 21Jul 28Aug 04Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25SeptemberSep 08Sep 15
1.86
2.89
GDIV
BDGS

Dividends

GDIV vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

GDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, more than BDGS's 0.74% yield.


TTM20232022
GDIV
Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF
1.39%2.28%9.85%
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
0.74%0.84%0.00%

Drawdowns

GDIV vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDIV drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDIV and BDGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-0.40%
-0.15%
GDIV
BDGS

Volatility

GDIV vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF (GDIV) has a higher volatility of 3.90% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 0.68%. This indicates that GDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
3.90%
0.68%
GDIV
BDGS