PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GDIV vs. COWZ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


GDIVCOWZ
YTD Return12.79%10.85%
1Y Return22.25%15.67%
3Y Return (Ann)3,219.09%11.00%
5Y Return (Ann)3,219.09%16.89%
Sharpe Ratio1.861.09
Daily Std Dev11.89%14.09%
Max Drawdown-100.00%-38.63%
Current Drawdown-0.40%-1.30%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between GDIV and COWZ is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

GDIV vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GDIV achieves a 12.79% return, which is significantly higher than COWZ's 10.85% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
5.79%
0.78%
GDIV
COWZ

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GDIV vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDIV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.


GDIV
Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF
Expense ratio chart for GDIV: current value at 0.50% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.50%
Expense ratio chart for COWZ: current value at 0.49% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.49%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GDIV vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF (GDIV) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GDIV
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GDIV, currently valued at 1.86, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.86
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GDIV, currently valued at 2.56, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.56
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GDIV, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.32
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GDIV, currently valued at 2.92, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.92
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GDIV, currently valued at 10.36, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0010.36
COWZ
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for COWZ, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.09
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for COWZ, currently valued at 1.64, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.64
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for COWZ, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.19
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for COWZ, currently valued at 1.85, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.85
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for COWZ, currently valued at 4.54, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.004.55

GDIV vs. COWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the COWZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of GDIV and COWZ.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.50AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
1.86
1.09
GDIV
COWZ

Dividends

GDIV vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison

GDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than COWZ's 2.00% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016
GDIV
Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF
1.39%2.28%9.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
2.00%1.92%1.96%1.48%2.54%1.96%1.67%1.95%0.13%

Drawdowns

GDIV vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDIV drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than COWZ's maximum drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDIV and COWZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-0.40%
-1.30%
GDIV
COWZ

Volatility

GDIV vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF (GDIV) is 3.90%, while Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) has a volatility of 4.33%. This indicates that GDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
3.90%
4.33%
GDIV
COWZ