GCOZX vs. AAAAX
Compare and contrast key facts about GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund (GCOZX) and DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A (AAAAX).
GCOZX is managed by GuideStone Funds. It was launched on Aug 26, 2001. AAAAX is managed by DWS. It was launched on Jul 30, 2007.
Performance
GCOZX vs. AAAAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GCOZX vs. AAAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCOZX GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund | -2.61% | 16.13% | 12.05% | 16.57% | -18.06% | 11.60% | 12.96% | 22.39% | -7.50% | 18.61% |
AAAAX DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A | 9.77% | 12.82% | 5.24% | 2.30% | -9.91% | 23.45% | 3.71% | 21.42% | -5.36% | 14.67% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCOZX achieves a -2.61% return, which is significantly lower than AAAAX's 9.77% return. Over the past 10 years, GCOZX has outperformed AAAAX with an annualized return of 8.14%, while AAAAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.40% annualized return.
GCOZX
- 1D
- 2.35%
- 1M
- -5.09%
- YTD
- -2.61%
- 6M
- -1.06%
- 1Y
- 12.48%
- 3Y*
- 11.87%
- 5Y*
- 5.29%
- 10Y*
- 8.14%
AAAAX
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -3.53%
- YTD
- 9.77%
- 6M
- 11.84%
- 1Y
- 17.50%
- 3Y*
- 10.19%
- 5Y*
- 6.78%
- 10Y*
- 7.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GCOZX vs. AAAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GCOZX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than AAAAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GCOZX vs. AAAAX — Risk / Return Rank
GCOZX
AAAAX
GCOZX vs. AAAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund (GCOZX) and DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A (AAAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GCOZX | AAAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.01 | 1.57 | -0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.48 | 2.11 | -0.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.32 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | 1.91 | -0.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.04 | 10.22 | -4.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GCOZX | AAAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 1.57 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.56 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.59 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.38 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between GCOZX and AAAAX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GCOZX vs. AAAAX - Dividend Comparison
GCOZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.85%, more than AAAAX's 3.23% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCOZX GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund | 9.85% | 9.59% | 3.47% | 3.37% | 9.49% | 6.85% | 4.94% | 9.42% | 4.24% | 4.71% | 5.71% | 19.06% |
AAAAX DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A | 3.23% | 3.54% | 2.45% | 2.08% | 4.17% | 2.31% | 1.33% | 1.81% | 1.61% | 1.52% | 1.47% | 2.15% |
Drawdowns
GCOZX vs. AAAAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCOZX drawdown since its inception was -47.79%, which is greater than AAAAX's maximum drawdown of -40.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCOZX and AAAAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCOZX | AAAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.79% | -40.47% | -7.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.23% | -9.55% | +0.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.19% | -22.62% | -2.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.50% | -29.41% | +1.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.91% | -3.53% | -2.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.56% | -6.89% | +0.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 1.79% | +0.33% |
Volatility
GCOZX vs. AAAAX - Volatility Comparison
GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund (GCOZX) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A (AAAAX) at 3.27%. This indicates that GCOZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GCOZX | AAAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | 3.27% | +1.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.74% | 7.26% | +0.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.77% | 11.62% | +1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.94% | 12.19% | -0.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.66% | 12.66% | 0.00% |