PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCOW vs. GAB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GCOW vs. GAB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) and The Gabelli Equity Trust Inc (GAB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCOW achieves a 12.75% return, which is significantly higher than GAB's -5.00% return. Over the past 10 years, GCOW has underperformed GAB with an annualized return of 10.32%, while GAB has yielded a comparatively higher 11.17% annualized return.


GCOW

1D
0.22%
1M
-0.62%
YTD
12.75%
6M
13.53%
1Y
24.34%
3Y*
16.79%
5Y*
12.37%
10Y*
10.32%

GAB

1D
0.36%
1M
1.07%
YTD
-5.00%
6M
-2.96%
1Y
7.76%
3Y*
10.78%
5Y*
5.48%
10Y*
11.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCOW vs. GAB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
12.75%27.34%3.52%13.95%5.49%14.58%-4.33%17.81%-7.99%20.71%
GAB
The Gabelli Equity Trust Inc
-5.00%27.03%18.05%3.37%-16.30%28.26%14.70%31.62%-8.77%24.66%

Correlation

The correlation between GCOW and GAB is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2016

0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between GCOW and GAB has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GCOW vs. GAB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCOW
GCOW Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
GCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
GCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

GAB
GAB Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
GAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAB Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
GAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAB Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCOW vs. GAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) and The Gabelli Equity Trust Inc (GAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GCOWGABDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.10

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.13

0.60

+4.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.09

1.55

+11.54

GCOW vs. GAB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCOW Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the GAB Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCOW and GAB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GCOW vs. GAB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCOW drawdown since its inception was -37.64%, smaller than the maximum GAB drawdown of -74.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCOW and GAB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GCOWGABDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.64%

-74.62%

+36.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.77%

-12.90%

+8.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.35%

-19.63%

+7.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.48%

-26.60%

+5.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.64%

-46.92%

+9.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.24%

-7.84%

+5.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.83%

-10.65%

+4.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

5.03%

-3.15%

Volatility

GCOW vs. GAB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) is 2.45%, while The Gabelli Equity Trust Inc (GAB) has a volatility of 3.16%. This indicates that GCOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GCOWGABDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.45%

3.16%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.96%

11.67%

-3.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.85%

14.66%

-3.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.49%

18.27%

-4.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.17%

21.92%

-5.75%

GCOW vs. GAB - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCOW has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than GAB's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

GCOW vs. GAB - Dividend Comparison

GCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, less than GAB's 10.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GAB
The Gabelli Equity Trust Inc
10.54%9.72%11.15%11.81%10.95%8.72%9.57%9.85%12.55%9.80%10.87%12.05%
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
4.67%4.06%5.14%5.28%4.39%4.23%4.12%4.40%3.94%2.79%1.95%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GCOW and GAB have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GAB has higher volatility (3.16%) compared to GCOW (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCOW dropped -37.64% vs GAB's -74.62%.

GCOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GCOW and GAB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer