PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GAB vs. ECF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GAB vs. ECF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Gabelli Equity Trust Inc (GAB) and Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd. (ECF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAB achieves a -5.51% return, which is significantly lower than ECF's 20.28% return. Over the past 10 years, GAB has underperformed ECF with an annualized return of 11.03%, while ECF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.54% annualized return.


GAB

1D
0.54%
1M
-1.06%
YTD
-5.51%
6M
-3.63%
1Y
8.86%
3Y*
11.95%
5Y*
5.43%
10Y*
11.03%

ECF

1D
1.03%
1M
8.35%
YTD
20.28%
6M
18.75%
1Y
51.91%
3Y*
27.81%
5Y*
7.28%
10Y*
13.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAB vs. ECF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GAB
The Gabelli Equity Trust Inc
-5.51%27.03%18.05%3.37%-16.30%28.26%14.70%31.62%-8.77%24.66%
ECF
Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd.
20.28%30.03%27.48%8.01%-31.63%-0.79%31.72%47.17%-3.70%19.51%

Correlation

The correlation between GAB and ECF is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 1990

0.30

The correlation between GAB and ECF shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.46 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GAB vs. ECF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAB
GAB Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
GAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAB Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
GAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAB Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

ECF
ECF Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
ECF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECF Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
ECF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECF Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAB vs. ECF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Gabelli Equity Trust Inc (GAB) and Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd. (ECF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GABECFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.61

2.81

-2.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.97

3.47

-2.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.46

-0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.70

4.02

-3.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.90

13.41

-11.51

GAB vs. ECF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAB Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the ECF Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAB and ECF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GABECFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

2.81

-2.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.41

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.62

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.37

-0.04

Drawdowns

GAB vs. ECF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAB drawdown since its inception was -74.62%, which is greater than ECF's maximum drawdown of -49.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAB and ECF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GABECFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.62%

-49.86%

-24.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.90%

-13.16%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.63%

-16.83%

-2.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.60%

-42.58%

+15.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.92%

-47.28%

+0.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.33%

0.00%

-8.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.65%

-10.15%

-0.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.76%

3.94%

+0.82%

Volatility

GAB vs. ECF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Gabelli Equity Trust Inc (GAB) is 3.60%, while Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd. (ECF) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that GAB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ECF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GABECFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

5.47%

-1.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.55%

14.55%

-3.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.53%

18.57%

-4.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.27%

17.71%

+0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.94%

21.78%

+0.16%

Dividends

GAB vs. ECF - Dividend Comparison

GAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.60%, more than ECF's 6.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ECF
Ellsworth Growth and Income Fund Ltd.
6.69%7.39%5.47%6.44%6.52%12.14%9.59%6.63%5.82%4.68%5.32%10.22%
GAB
The Gabelli Equity Trust Inc
10.60%9.72%11.15%11.81%10.95%8.72%9.57%9.85%12.55%9.80%10.87%12.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


GAB and ECF have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ECF has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to GAB (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAB dropped -74.62% vs ECF's -49.86%.

ECF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GAB and ECF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer