GCOW vs. BST
GCOW (Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF) is Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index, while BST (BlackRock Science and Technology Trust) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, GCOW returned 10.32%/yr vs 20.10%/yr for BST. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GCOW vs. BST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCOW achieves a 12.75% return, which is significantly lower than BST's 21.48% return. Over the past 10 years, GCOW has underperformed BST with an annualized return of 10.32%, while BST has yielded a comparatively higher 20.10% annualized return.
GCOW
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 12.75%
- 6M
- 13.53%
- 1Y
- 24.86%
- 3Y*
- 16.79%
- 5Y*
- 12.37%
- 10Y*
- 10.32%
BST
- 1D
- 2.64%
- 1M
- 5.40%
- YTD
- 21.48%
- 6M
- 27.08%
- 1Y
- 43.07%
- 3Y*
- 22.50%
- 5Y*
- 4.54%
- 10Y*
- 20.10%
GCOW vs. BST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 12.75% | 27.34% | 3.52% | 13.95% | 5.49% | 14.58% | -4.33% | 17.81% | -7.99% | 20.71% |
BST BlackRock Science and Technology Trust | 21.48% | 23.65% | 17.96% | 30.07% | -38.28% | -0.35% | 69.27% | 34.57% | 8.84% | 57.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between GCOW and BST is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2016 | 0.42 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GCOW and BST has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GCOW vs. BST — Risk / Return Rank
GCOW
BST
GCOW vs. BST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) and BlackRock Science and Technology Trust (BST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GCOW | BST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.39 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.13 | 2.76 | +2.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.09 | 8.87 | +4.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GCOW vs. BST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCOW drawdown since its inception was -37.64%, smaller than the maximum BST drawdown of -47.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCOW and BST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCOW | BST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.64% | -47.72% | +10.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.77% | -15.31% | +10.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.35% | -23.37% | +11.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.48% | -47.72% | +26.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.64% | -47.72% | +10.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.24% | -4.13% | +1.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.83% | -12.96% | +7.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 4.76% | -2.88% |
Volatility
GCOW vs. BST - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) is 2.45%, while BlackRock Science and Technology Trust (BST) has a volatility of 9.75%. This indicates that GCOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GCOW | BST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.45% | 9.75% | -7.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.96% | 16.86% | -8.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.85% | 19.44% | -8.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.49% | 23.81% | -10.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.17% | 25.83% | -9.66% |
Dividends
GCOW vs. BST - Dividend Comparison
GCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, less than BST's 8.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BST BlackRock Science and Technology Trust | 8.27% | 10.36% | 8.21% | 8.91% | 10.57% | 5.38% | 3.85% | 10.52% | 6.41% | 4.80% | 6.69% | 6.93% |
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 4.67% | 4.06% | 5.14% | 5.28% | 4.39% | 4.23% | 4.12% | 4.40% | 3.94% | 2.79% | 1.95% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GCOW and BST have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BST has higher volatility (9.75%) compared to GCOW (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCOW dropped -37.64% vs BST's -47.72%.
GCOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GCOW and BST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer