PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCBC vs. NEE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GCBC vs. NEE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Greene County Bancorp, Inc. (GCBC) and NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCBC achieves a 45.46% return, which is significantly higher than NEE's 11.12% return. Over the past 10 years, GCBC has outperformed NEE with an annualized return of 16.21%, while NEE has yielded a comparatively lower 13.56% annualized return.


GCBC

1D
0.06%
1M
6.30%
6M
45.40%
YTD
45.46%
1Y
31.41%
3Y*
5.46%
5Y*
19.57%
10Y*
16.21%

NEE

1D
0.99%
1M
2.29%
6M
11.66%
YTD
11.12%
1Y
21.65%
3Y*
10.00%
5Y*
5.99%
10Y*
13.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCBC vs. NEE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GCBC
Greene County Bancorp, Inc.
45.46%-18.53%-0.61%-0.57%57.91%46.75%-9.74%-6.14%-3.39%44.60%
NEE
NextEra Energy, Inc.
11.12%15.47%21.46%-25.30%-8.54%23.39%30.06%42.69%14.30%34.39%

Correlation

The correlation between GCBC and NEE is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2003

0.07

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GCBC:

$546.01M

NEE:

$183.45B

EPS

GCBC:

$2.51

NEE:

$5.91

PE Ratio

GCBC:

12.78

NEE:

14.87

PEG Ratio

GCBC:

1.55

NEE:

0.76

PS Ratio

GCBC:

3.41

NEE:

4.36

Total Revenue (TTM)

GCBC:

$106.77M

NEE:

$27.93B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GCBC:

$63.62M

NEE:

$13.35B

EBITDA (TTM)

GCBC:

$33.26M

NEE:

$14.56B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GCBC vs. NEE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCBC
GCBC Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
GCBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCBC Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
GCBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCBC Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

NEE
NEE Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
NEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
NEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEE Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCBC vs. NEE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Greene County Bancorp, Inc. (GCBC) and NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GCBCNEEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.18

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

1.47

+0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.37

3.65

-0.28

GCBC vs. NEE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCBC Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is comparable to the NEE Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCBC and NEE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GCBC vs. NEE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCBC drawdown since its inception was -53.06%, which is greater than NEE's maximum drawdown of -47.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCBC and NEE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GCBCNEEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.06%

-47.81%

-5.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.16%

-14.53%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.92%

-34.57%

-8.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.06%

-44.97%

-8.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.06%

-44.97%

-8.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.83%

-9.48%

-2.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.62%

-8.93%

-5.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.30%

5.83%

+3.47%

Volatility

GCBC vs. NEE - Volatility Comparison

Greene County Bancorp, Inc. (GCBC) has a higher volatility of 13.80% compared to NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) at 4.63%. This indicates that GCBC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GCBCNEEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.80%

4.63%

+9.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.34%

16.73%

+6.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.12%

22.82%

+13.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.52%

26.92%

+16.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.61%

25.48%

+17.13%

Dividends

GCBC vs. NEE - Dividend Comparison

GCBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than NEE's 2.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCBC
Greene County Bancorp, Inc.
1.25%1.71%1.23%1.06%0.94%1.36%1.80%1.46%1.27%1.18%1.64%2.28%
NEE
NextEra Energy, Inc.
2.71%2.82%2.87%3.08%2.03%1.65%1.81%2.06%2.55%2.52%2.91%2.96%

Financials

GCBC vs. NEE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Greene County Bancorp, Inc. and NextEra Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
6.70B
(GCBC) Total Revenue
(NEE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


GCBC and NEE have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GCBC has higher volatility (13.80%) compared to NEE (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCBC dropped -53.06% vs NEE's -47.81%.

NEE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GCBC and NEE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer