PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBSL.TO vs. XDGH.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GBSL.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Ninepoint Global Select Fund - Series ETF (GBSL.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XDGH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GBSL.TO

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XDGH.TO

1D
0.22%
1M
2.06%
YTD
8.02%
6M
9.08%
1Y
18.94%
3Y*
13.47%
5Y*
8.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBSL.TO vs. XDGH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBSL.TO

XDGH.TO
XDGH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
XDGH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDGH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDGH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
XDGH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDGH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBSL.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ninepoint Global Select Fund - Series ETF (GBSL.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XDGH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GBSL.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GBSL.TOXDGH.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

Drawdowns

GBSL.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBSL.TOXDGH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

Volatility

GBSL.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBSL.TOXDGH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.48%

GBSL.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBSL.TO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XDGH.TO's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

GBSL.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Dividend Comparison

GBSL.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XDGH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GBSL.TO
Ninepoint Global Select Fund - Series ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XDGH.TO
iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
2.79%2.81%3.04%3.41%3.20%3.13%3.35%2.92%3.40%1.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, XDGH.TO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDGH.TO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GBSL.TO.

They also come from different issuers: Ninepoint and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GBSL.TO and 0.22% for XDGH.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBSL.TO and XDGH.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer