GBSL.TO vs. XDGH.TO
GBSL.TO (Ninepoint Global Select Fund - Series ETF) and XDGH.TO (iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) are both Global Equities funds. GBSL.TO is actively managed, while XDGH.TO is passively managed. GBSL.TO charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for XDGH.TO.
Performance
GBSL.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GBSL.TO
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDGH.TO
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- YTD
- 8.02%
- 6M
- 9.08%
- 1Y
- 18.94%
- 3Y*
- 13.47%
- 5Y*
- 8.47%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GBSL.TO vs. XDGH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
GBSL.TO
XDGH.TO
GBSL.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ninepoint Global Select Fund - Series ETF (GBSL.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XDGH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GBSL.TO | XDGH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.97 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.35 | — |
Drawdowns
GBSL.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GBSL.TO | XDGH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -34.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -1.46% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -4.66% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.15% | — |
Volatility
GBSL.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GBSL.TO | XDGH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.51% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.85% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 9.68% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 14.94% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 23.48% | — |
GBSL.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GBSL.TO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XDGH.TO's 0.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
GBSL.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Dividend Comparison
GBSL.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XDGH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBSL.TO Ninepoint Global Select Fund - Series ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XDGH.TO iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 2.79% | 2.81% | 3.04% | 3.41% | 3.20% | 3.13% | 3.35% | 2.92% | 3.40% | 1.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, XDGH.TO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDGH.TO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GBSL.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Ninepoint and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GBSL.TO and 0.22% for XDGH.TO.
Find the right allocation for GBSL.TO and XDGH.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer