XDGH.TO vs. ACWV

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XDGH.TO) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV).

XDGH.TO and ACWV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XDGH.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD. It was launched on Jun 13, 2017. ACWV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI AC World Minimum Volatility (USD). It was launched on Oct 18, 2011. Both XDGH.TO and ACWV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

XDGH.TO vs. ACWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XDGH.TO) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XDGH.TO vs. ACWV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XDGH.TO iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)	4.35%	14.60%	10.46%	8.74%	-1.32%	15.60%	-4.34%	22.32%	-4.99%	2.63%
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF	2.00%	5.95%	20.95%	5.85%	-3.97%	12.94%	1.30%	15.09%	6.94%	5.17%

Different Trading Currencies

XDGH.TO is traded in CAD, while ACWV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ACWV values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDGH.TO achieves a 4.35% return, which is significantly higher than ACWV's 2.00% return.

XDGH.TO

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: -4.81%
• YTD: 4.35%
• 6M: 8.79%
• 1Y: 13.17%
• 3Y*: 12.13%
• 5Y*: 8.59%
• 10Y*: —

ACWV

• 1D: 1.25%
• 1M: -2.66%
• YTD: 2.00%
• 6M: 0.65%
• 1Y: 1.37%
• 3Y*: 10.83%
• 5Y*: 8.31%
• 10Y*: 8.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDGH.TO vs. ACWV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDGH.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWV's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

XDGH.TO

iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

ACWV

iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF

Return for Risk

XDGH.TO vs. ACWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDGH.TO

XDGH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 52
XDGH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
XDGH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
XDGH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 54
XDGH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
XDGH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 58

ACWV

ACWV Risk / Return Rank: 30
ACWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
ACWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
ACWV Omega Ratio Rank: 27
ACWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
ACWV Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDGH.TO vs. ACWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XDGH.TO) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XDGH.TO	ACWV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	0.14	+0.75
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.36	0.25	+1.11
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.03	+0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.22	0.30	+0.92
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.70	0.95	+4.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XDGH.TO vs. ACWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDGH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is higher than the ACWV Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDGH.TO and ACWV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XDGH.TO	ACWV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89	0.14	+0.75
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	0.96	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.74	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	1.01	-0.48

Correlation

The correlation between XDGH.TO and ACWV is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

XDGH.TO vs. ACWV - Dividend Comparison

XDGH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, more than ACWV's 2.07% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
XDGH.TO iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)	2.83%	2.81%	3.04%	3.41%	3.18%	3.05%	3.24%	2.82%	3.29%	0.81%	0.00%	0.00%
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF	2.07%	2.09%	2.33%	2.41%	2.18%	1.92%	1.77%	2.54%	2.32%	2.04%	2.56%	2.28%

Drawdowns

XDGH.TO vs. ACWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDGH.TO drawdown since its inception was -32.99%, which is greater than ACWV's maximum drawdown of -22.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDGH.TO and ACWV.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDGH.TO	ACWV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.99%	-28.82%	-4.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.17%	-7.56%	-3.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.56%	-18.14%	+3.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.81%	-4.54%	-0.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.65%	-3.11%	-0.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.43%	1.73%	+0.70%

Volatility

XDGH.TO vs. ACWV - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XDGH.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.61% compared to iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) at 3.20%. This indicates that XDGH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XDGH.TO	ACWV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.61%	3.20%	+0.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.18%	5.87%	+1.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.93%	10.18%	+4.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.13%	8.71%	+3.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.68%	10.96%	+3.72%