GBSL.TO vs. TINF.TO
GBSL.TO (Ninepoint Global Select Fund - Series ETF) and TINF.TO (TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. GBSL.TO charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for TINF.TO.
Performance
GBSL.TO vs. TINF.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GBSL.TO
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TINF.TO
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -0.88%
- YTD
- 10.30%
- 6M
- 10.53%
- 1Y
- 15.93%
- 3Y*
- 17.03%
- 5Y*
- 12.86%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GBSL.TO vs. TINF.TO — Risk / Return Rank
GBSL.TO
TINF.TO
GBSL.TO vs. TINF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ninepoint Global Select Fund - Series ETF (GBSL.TO) and TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF (TINF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GBSL.TO | TINF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.98 | — |
Drawdowns
GBSL.TO vs. TINF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GBSL.TO | TINF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -13.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -3.30% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -2.46% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.98% | — |
Volatility
GBSL.TO vs. TINF.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GBSL.TO | TINF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.89% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.82% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 10.40% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 11.89% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 12.07% | — |
GBSL.TO vs. TINF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GBSL.TO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than TINF.TO's 0.73% expense ratio.
Dividends
GBSL.TO vs. TINF.TO - Dividend Comparison
GBSL.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TINF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBSL.TO Ninepoint Global Select Fund - Series ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TINF.TO TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF | 2.64% | 2.89% | 2.85% | 3.39% | 2.97% | 2.28% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, TINF.TO is cheaper at 0.73% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TINF.TO is cheaper with a 0.73% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GBSL.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Ninepoint and TD. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GBSL.TO and 0.73% for TINF.TO.
Find the right allocation for GBSL.TO and TINF.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer