PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBSL.TO vs. TINF.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GBSL.TO vs. TINF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Ninepoint Global Select Fund - Series ETF (GBSL.TO) and TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF (TINF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GBSL.TO

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TINF.TO

1D
-0.43%
1M
-0.88%
YTD
10.30%
6M
10.53%
1Y
15.93%
3Y*
17.03%
5Y*
12.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBSL.TO vs. TINF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBSL.TO

TINF.TO
TINF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
TINF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TINF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
TINF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
TINF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
TINF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBSL.TO vs. TINF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ninepoint Global Select Fund - Series ETF (GBSL.TO) and TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF (TINF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GBSL.TO vs. TINF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GBSL.TOTINF.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

Drawdowns

GBSL.TO vs. TINF.TO - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBSL.TOTINF.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

Volatility

GBSL.TO vs. TINF.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBSL.TOTINF.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.07%

GBSL.TO vs. TINF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBSL.TO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than TINF.TO's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

GBSL.TO vs. TINF.TO - Dividend Comparison

GBSL.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TINF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GBSL.TO
Ninepoint Global Select Fund - Series ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TINF.TO
TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF
2.64%2.89%2.85%3.39%2.97%2.28%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, TINF.TO is cheaper at 0.73% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TINF.TO is cheaper with a 0.73% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GBSL.TO.

They also come from different issuers: Ninepoint and TD. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GBSL.TO and 0.73% for TINF.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBSL.TO and TINF.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer