PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
GBSL.TO vs. GBUL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

GBSL.TO vs. GBUL.TO

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

GBSL.TO (Ninepoint Global Select Fund - Series ETF) and GBUL.TO (Ninepoint Gold Bullion Fund Series ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GBSL.TO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Ninepoint, while GBUL.TO is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. GBSL.TO is actively managed, while GBUL.TO is passively managed. GBSL.TO charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GBUL.TO.

Performance

GBSL.TO vs. GBUL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Ninepoint Global Select Fund - Series ETF (GBSL.TO) and Ninepoint Gold Bullion Fund Series ETF (GBUL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

GBSL.TO

1D
—
1M
—
YTD
—
6M
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

GBUL.TO

1D
—
1M
—
YTD
—
6M
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Ninepoint Global Select Fund - Series ETF

Ninepoint Gold Bullion Fund Series ETF

Often compared with GBSL.TO:
GBSL.TO vs. CYH.TOGBSL.TO vs. ECHI.TOGBSL.TO vs. GEQT.TOGBSL.TO vs. HEQT.TOGBSL.TO vs. MEQT.TOGBSL.TO vs. NNRG.NEOGBSL.TO vs. TEQT.TO
Often compared with GBUL.TO:
GBUL.TO vs. ZGLD.TOGBUL.TO vs. AMAX.TOGBUL.TO vs. CGL.TOGBUL.TO vs. CGXF.TOGBUL.TO vs. ECHI.TOGBUL.TO vs. GLCC.TOGBUL.TO vs. HGGG.TO

Return for Risk

GBSL.TO vs. GBUL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ninepoint Global Select Fund - Series ETF (GBSL.TO) and Ninepoint Gold Bullion Fund Series ETF (GBUL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GBSL.TO vs. GBUL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GBSL.TO vs. GBUL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility

GBSL.TO vs. GBUL.TO - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

GBSL.TO vs. GBUL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBSL.TO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than GBUL.TO's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

GBSL.TO vs. GBUL.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither GBSL.TO nor GBUL.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

On fees, GBUL.TO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GBUL.TO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GBSL.TO.

GBSL.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while GBUL.TO is Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GBSL.TO and 0.50% for GBUL.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBSL.TO and GBUL.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer