PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBSL.TO vs. CYH.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GBSL.TO vs. CYH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Ninepoint Global Select Fund - Series ETF (GBSL.TO) and iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CYH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GBSL.TO

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CYH.TO

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.25%
YTD
10.09%
6M
10.83%
1Y
23.64%
3Y*
16.57%
5Y*
8.51%
10Y*
7.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBSL.TO vs. CYH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBSL.TO

CYH.TO
CYH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
CYH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CYH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
CYH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
CYH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
CYH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBSL.TO vs. CYH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ninepoint Global Select Fund - Series ETF (GBSL.TO) and iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CYH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GBSL.TO vs. CYH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GBSL.TOCYH.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

Drawdowns

GBSL.TO vs. CYH.TO - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBSL.TOCYH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.39%

Volatility

GBSL.TO vs. CYH.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBSL.TOCYH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.19%

GBSL.TO vs. CYH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBSL.TO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CYH.TO's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

GBSL.TO vs. CYH.TO - Dividend Comparison

GBSL.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CYH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CYH.TO
iShares Global Monthly Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
3.33%3.77%4.33%4.68%4.72%3.89%4.51%4.18%3.98%3.03%3.39%3.84%
GBSL.TO
Ninepoint Global Select Fund - Series ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, CYH.TO is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CYH.TO is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GBSL.TO.

They also come from different issuers: Ninepoint and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GBSL.TO and 0.66% for CYH.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBSL.TO and CYH.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer