PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
GBSL.TO vs. MEQT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

GBSL.TO vs. MEQT.TO

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

GBSL.TO (Ninepoint Global Select Fund - Series ETF) and MEQT.TO (Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. GBSL.TO charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for MEQT.TO.

Performance

GBSL.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Ninepoint Global Select Fund - Series ETF (GBSL.TO) and Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF (MEQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

GBSL.TO

1D
—
1M
—
YTD
—
6M
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

MEQT.TO

1D
—
1M
—
YTD
—
6M
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Ninepoint Global Select Fund - Series ETF

Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF

Often compared with GBSL.TO:
GBSL.TO vs. CYH.TOGBSL.TO vs. GBUL.TOGBSL.TO vs. TINF.TOGBSL.TO vs. TTTX.TOGBSL.TO vs. VDU.TOGBSL.TO vs. VEF.TOGBSL.TO vs. VVL.TO
Often compared with MEQT.TO:
MEQT.TO vs. VXC.TOMEQT.TO vs. ZEQT.TOMEQT.TO vs. CAGE.TOMEQT.TO vs. XEQT.TOMEQT.TO vs. FCIN.NEOMEQT.TO vs. TINF.TOMEQT.TO vs. XDG.TO

Return for Risk

GBSL.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ninepoint Global Select Fund - Series ETF (GBSL.TO) and Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF (MEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GBSL.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GBSL.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility

GBSL.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

GBSL.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBSL.TO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than MEQT.TO's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

GBSL.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither GBSL.TO nor MEQT.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

On fees, MEQT.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MEQT.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GBSL.TO.

They also come from different issuers: Ninepoint and Mackenzie Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GBSL.TO and 0.17% for MEQT.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBSL.TO and MEQT.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer