GBSL.TO vs. VVL.TO
GBSL.TO (Ninepoint Global Select Fund - Series ETF) and VVL.TO (Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. GBSL.TO charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for VVL.TO.
Performance
GBSL.TO vs. VVL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GBSL.TO
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VVL.TO
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 10.88%
- 6M
- 8.65%
- 1Y
- 31.51%
- 3Y*
- 19.83%
- 5Y*
- 13.21%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GBSL.TO vs. VVL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
GBSL.TO
VVL.TO
GBSL.TO vs. VVL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ninepoint Global Select Fund - Series ETF (GBSL.TO) and Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD (VVL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GBSL.TO | VVL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.63 | — |
Drawdowns
GBSL.TO vs. VVL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GBSL.TO | VVL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -43.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.97% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -5.79% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.26% | — |
Volatility
GBSL.TO vs. VVL.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GBSL.TO | VVL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.32% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.95% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 14.05% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 16.09% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 18.97% | — |
GBSL.TO vs. VVL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GBSL.TO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than VVL.TO's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
GBSL.TO vs. VVL.TO - Dividend Comparison
GBSL.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VVL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBSL.TO Ninepoint Global Select Fund - Series ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VVL.TO Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD | 1.70% | 1.89% | 2.19% | 2.69% | 2.57% | 1.50% | 1.70% | 2.65% | 2.15% | 1.35% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, VVL.TO is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VVL.TO is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GBSL.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Ninepoint and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GBSL.TO and 0.38% for VVL.TO.
Find the right allocation for GBSL.TO and VVL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer