MEQT.TO vs. FCIN.NEO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF (MEQT.TO) and Fidelity All-International Equity ETF (FCIN.NEO).

MEQT.TO and FCIN.NEO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MEQT.TO is an actively managed fund by Mackenzie Investments. It was launched on Nov 20, 2023. FCIN.NEO is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Feb 1, 2024.

Performance

MEQT.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF (MEQT.TO) and Fidelity All-International Equity ETF (FCIN.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MEQT.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MEQT.TO Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF	0.51%	21.31%	22.42%
FCIN.NEO Fidelity All-International Equity ETF	6.13%	26.32%	9.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEQT.TO achieves a 0.51% return, which is significantly lower than FCIN.NEO's 6.13% return.

MEQT.TO

• 1D: 2.74%
• 1M: -4.35%
• YTD: 0.51%
• 6M: 4.06%
• 1Y: 22.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FCIN.NEO

• 1D: 2.72%
• 1M: -5.34%
• YTD: 6.13%
• 6M: 9.44%
• 1Y: 21.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEQT.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEQT.TO

Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF

Return for Risk

MEQT.TO vs. FCIN.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEQT.TO

MEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 82
MEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
MEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
MEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 87
MEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
MEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 81

FCIN.NEO

FCIN.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 74
FCIN.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
FCIN.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FCIN.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 71
FCIN.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FCIN.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEQT.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF (MEQT.TO) and Fidelity All-International Equity ETF (FCIN.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MEQT.TO	FCIN.NEO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.68	1.36	+0.32
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.26	1.92	+0.34
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.27	+0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.04	2.01	+0.03
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.17	8.50	+0.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MEQT.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the FCIN.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEQT.TO and FCIN.NEO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MEQT.TO	FCIN.NEO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.68	1.36	+0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.77	1.43	+0.35

Correlation

The correlation between MEQT.TO and FCIN.NEO is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MEQT.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Dividend Comparison

MEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, while FCIN.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
MEQT.TO Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF	1.63%	1.60%	1.73%	0.81%
FCIN.NEO Fidelity All-International Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

MEQT.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.14%, which is greater than FCIN.NEO's maximum drawdown of -12.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEQT.TO and FCIN.NEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	MEQT.TO	FCIN.NEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.14%	-12.34%	-2.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.19%	-10.07%	-1.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.89%	-5.52%	+0.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.32%	-1.54%	+0.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.49%	2.64%	-0.15%

Volatility

MEQT.TO vs. FCIN.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF (MEQT.TO) is 5.75%, while Fidelity All-International Equity ETF (FCIN.NEO) has a volatility of 6.82%. This indicates that MEQT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCIN.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MEQT.TO	FCIN.NEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.75%	6.82%	-1.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.20%	10.27%	-1.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.61%	15.59%	-1.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.90%	13.85%	-1.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.90%	13.85%	-1.95%